So, let me say this upfront — HR Tech is my favorite event of the year. It feels a bit like the annual family reunion and an HR Super Bowl all in one. I meet up with partners and industry friends and we share insights, progress, and lessons learned. It’s the ultimate meeting of the minds and it’s amazing to have those conversations in person over a drink, a meal, or on the show floor as we visit each other’s booths and learn about what’s next. Now that I’ve had a few days to collect my thoughts, I wanted to share a few insights from the show:
It’s been a few years since ChatGPT really exploded onto the HR Tech scene. Back then, it felt like every booth touted its AI capabilities while being a bit more vague on what that meant for the customer. While the hype surrounding AI has slowed down, we’re starting to see more interesting products being launched that go beyond the AI-chatbots of yore. Notable examples include ADP Lyric and Rippling Talent Signal, both of which create new ways to solve everlasting HR problems like performance management. I wouldn’t blame you if you’ve fallen off the AI-hype train, but we’re going to see more and more game-changing launches in the years to come.
Another growing trend is the bundling of applicant tracking systems (ATS) and sourcing tools. This is usually combined with an AI layer into a single (and really compelling) offering for talent acquisition teams. This is now possible due to better connectivity between ATS and sourcing systems, both of which operated in silos until recently. Talent teams can now review more people (both applicants and non-applicants) and better identify the ones that represent the best “fit” for the roles they are trying to fill.
For employers, this means they can buy more services from a single vendor, saving money in the process. Talent teams not only have one less tool to deal with, but can also leverage new AI tools that simplify and automate tasks such as creating job descriptions (JDs) or parsing through resumes.
For ATS, this move up the candidate funnel helps them better serve their customers by giving them full visibility into their recruitment funnel. This also helps with retention, as existing HRIS/payroll providers are building their own ATS and continue to push into the recruitment space.
Many, if not most, companies are trying to drive growth with existing teams without hiring too many net-new workers. We all want to work smarter and be more effective. This creates a few challenges for People teams who are tasked with driving high engagement and productivity:
Many people engagement/analytics platforms are trying to boost engagement and retention in the following ways:
This focus is a clear signal that companies are rethinking their strategies for maximizing workforce potential in this shifting macroeconomic environment.
One recurring theme across my conversations at the show was the ongoing struggle with connectivity — particularly the lack of integration from the HRIS/payroll system to third-party applications. This is where Finch shines: we’re enabling better connectivity between systems of record like HRIS/payroll and the core platforms used to manage everyday employment workflows. This impacts both the employee and the employer experience, as well as the companies that serve them. As the paradigm shifts toward more open marketplaces and interoperability, platforms are discovering ways to provide better experiences for their customers and new revenue opportunities by creating innovative workflows, products, and features that are powered by Finch's underlying API. They are also empowering customers to choose which applications they want to use, an important requirement for companies as they grow in size and complexity.
HR Tech 2024 made it clear that the future of HR is rooted in practical AI applications, enhanced integrations, and a renewed focus on internal engagement and mobility. For Finch, it’s exciting to be at the forefront of solving connectivity issues and providing solutions that help HR teams adapt to these growing trends.
With the right tools, HR leaders can look forward to a future where AI, connectivity, and employee experience converge to create a more productive, happy, and dynamic workforce.
The employment ecosystem—the collection of B2B software applications that employers use to manage their workforce—is deeply fragmented and complex.
To date, this has been broadly accepted as the unavoidable reality of a highly regulated, disconnected industry. But at Finch, we have a vision for an open, standardized, interconnected future of employment technology. We call it the Open Employment Ecosystem.
To illustrate this vision, we created the Open Employment Ecosystem Market Map: a visual representation of the technologies that sit at the intersection of payroll, HR tech, benefits, and fintech. Alex Tran, Managing Director at General Catalyst, put it this way:
"Companies today use many applications to manage their workforce, leaving critical employee data scattered across systems of record and point solutions. While companies continue to choose best-of-breed tools for their specific needs, the lack of connectivity between these systems is a huge challenge—especially to and from payroll systems.
"The vision of an Open Employment Ecosystem where data flows seamlessly is the primary reason we backed the Finch team, and we’re thrilled to see the first version of their market map feature other General Catalyst portfolio companies such as Awardco, Factorial, Gusto and Thatch."
The employment ecosystem consists of two types of technology: systems of record and point solutions, or applications.
Systems of record are tools like HRIS and payroll that act as the source of truth for employers. These systems hold all of the information about a company’s workforce: census details, earnings statements, employment history, tax data, and much more. Applications are the standalone human resource, benefits, and financial tools that rely on that employee data to function.
Given this relationship, all of the tools within this ecosystem are interlinked and must rely on each other in some way. At the center of the map are HRIS and payroll systems: where all employee data originates. From here, the data must be shared with applications that fall under one of three main categories: HR tech, benefits, and fintech. Data may ultimately move from application to application, but only after being routed through the systems of record at the foundation of the ecosystem.
In our vision for the Open Employment Ecosystem, all of these applications and systems of record will benefit from bidirectional integrations with one another. Any time an employer makes a change in one application, that information will be seamlessly and automatically relayed back to the system of record, which will in turn push that change out across the rest of the applications in the employer’s tech stack.
More than 150 million employment records are exchanged via CSV upload, SFTP, and manual operations every year. While the world has advanced technologically, the employment sector is still reliant on antiquated, cumbersome, error-prone processes, because until now, there’s been no alternative.
What the ecosystem lacks is a shared infrastructure: a means for quickly, securely, and automatically sharing data across disparate systems. As a result, innovation is stifled, and HR departments are bogged down with unavoidable administrative work: 64% of HR leaders report wasting up to nine hours on manual data entry each week, where the average cost of a single point of data entry is $4.78.
At Finch, we’re building the foundational infrastructure that has evaded the employment industry for decades. Our unified API bridges the gap between systems of record and applications on behalf of employers. We’ve built integrations with hundreds of HRIS and payroll systems that use data standardization and clear rules of engagement for seamless syncing, so employee data is securely delivered to applications in a standardized format, regardless of its origin system.
Similar to the way Plaid introduced the era of Open Finance through its financial API, Finch aims to create the Open Employment Ecosystem through our Unified Employment API. Our mission is to empower innovators with democratized access to global employment systems. With security and compliance as the backbone of our infrastructure, Finch will ultimately build the connection between all of these platforms and empower a new wave of innovators to create a better future of work—one that benefits systems of record, applications, and employers in equal measure.
Download the market map, or learn more about Finch’s vision for the Open Employment Ecosystem.
Sitting at the intersection of payroll, HR, benefits, and fintech is the employment ecosystem: the collection of B2B software applications that employers use to manage their workforce. Combined, the billions of employee records and data points within these systems power nearly every digital interaction between employers and the employees they serve: onboarding, day-to-day communications, job performance, compensation, healthcare, and more.
But the employment ecosystem of today is deeply fragmented across more than 20,000 software systems—6,000 of those in payroll alone. These distinct systems are siloed, leaving critical employee data scattered across various systems in differing formats.
At Finch, we believe employment technology is on the precipice of a new era—one in which the tools in employers’ tech stacks are connected by a robust foundational infrastructure that makes access to employment data secure and programmable. We call this the Open Employment Ecosystem.
Introducing the Open Employment Ecosystem Market Map: our visual representation of the technologies that sit at the intersection of HR tech, benefits, and fintech. Get your copy →
The employment ecosystem consists of two primary types of technology: systems of record like HRIS and payroll that act as employers’ source of truth, and point solutions, which we refer to simply as “applications”—the standalone human resource, benefits, and financial tools that rely on employment data to function.
The ecosystem’s lack of a common infrastructure presents two major problems. The first is that it’s incredibly challenging to derive and act on insights from disparate data sources. The second is that any change made to one system needs to be manually changed in every other system—creating a poor user experience that can lead to customer churn for applications.
This lack of connectivity stifles innovation and creates an onerous, unavoidable administrative burden for HR departments: 64% of HR leaders report wasting up to nine hours every week on manual data entry, where the average cost of a single point of data entry is a whopping $4.78.
To effectively serve employers—and by extension, their employees—we need standard rules, processes, and procedures for sharing data between systems of record and applications. This dynamic has paved the way for the gradual but undeniable emergence of the Open Employment Ecosystem.
More than 150 million employment records are exchanged via CSV upload, SFTP, and manual operations every year. The world no longer works this way, but the employment sector still does because until now, there’s been no alternative.
As the source of truth for employers, systems of record like HRIS and payroll are the gatekeepers of this mission-critical employee data, but they lack the infrastructure that would allow point solutions to easily integrate with their technology. Building 1:1 integrations between every system of record and point solution is an impossible task, the collective cost of which would reach into the billions. Too few of these integrations exist today because of the risks associated with such a large resource investment.
The Open Employment Ecosystem will enable employers to share mission-critical employment data efficiently, reliably, and automatically through a shared infrastructure built on API integrations. That data flow has enormous potential to unlock new innovation in employment tech and deliver vast improvements to how employers can attract, serve, and support employees.
The first step in achieving this Open Employment Ecosystem is building the open, programmable infrastructure that helps all of these technologies—systems of record and point solutions—to integrate with one another. Similar to the way Plaid introduced the era of Open Finance through its financial API, Finch aims to create the Open Employment Ecosystem through our Unified Employment API.
Our mission is to empower innovators with democratized access to global employment systems. With security and compliance as the backbone of our infrastructure, Finch will ultimately build the connection between all of these platforms and empower a new wave of innovators to create a better future of work.
The movement toward openness, connectivity, and programmability within the employment ecosystem is driven by three key trends: the proliferation of point solutions, a growing demand for interoperability, and the emergence of unified APIs.
Since the turn of the century, there's been a shift from do-it-all tech to specialized, best-of-breed software that excels at one thing, leading to a surge in tool usage—the average large company now leverages 80+ employee-facing systems.
Each of these tools hold employment records that regularly need to be updated, ideally all at once, which means employers don’t have the bandwidth to continue adopting point solutions that operate in a silo. That leaves two options: relying on monolithic, closed systems with native connectivity (similar to the legacy systems that dominated the industry before the cloud), or creating an interconnected ecosystem in which all applications, regardless of their parent company or backend data model, can communicate seamlessly.
We at Finch believe that the second approach is a better fit for the employment sector because of the inherent nuance in employment. For example, a construction company will have far different needs for managing their employees as compared to an advertising firm. By creating the Open Employment Ecosystem, employers will have the freedom to choose the best solution for their unique needs while still enjoying the benefits of an integrated system.
Application programming interfaces (APIs) are widely adopted today, but they aren’t standardized—they operate on different backend data models, which can make it difficult to teach two systems to “talk” to each other.
This challenge has fueled the emergence of unified APIs. They act as an abstraction layer, managing the complexities of communicating with many APIs on their customer’s behalf. Companies need only build one integration to the API provider to unlock two-way communication with dozens or hundreds of applications.
Plaid is one of the most widely recognized unified APIs. By creating a standardized data bridge in the financial industry—infamous for being antiquated, heavily regulated, and slow—Plaid unlocked unprecedented innovation in fintech. The employment industry, which is even more deeply fragmented than finance used to be, is primed to benefit from the same kind of unified, standardized connectivity model.
When employment data is free to securely flow between systems of record and applications, everyone wins. Systems of record can freely integrate with more applications, furthering their product stickiness; applications are able to access the employee data they need to function while lessening the administrative burden on their customers; and employers are afforded the freedom to use the tools best suited for their workforce, unencumbered by system incompatibility.
Systems of record recognize the value of the data they hold, so it may seem at first that they’d have something to lose in an open ecosystem. In reality, they have much to gain by simplifying their customers’ data sharing experience: the more applications that can easily plug in to their databases, the more these systems will be able to stabilize and expand their footing as the primary source of truth for employment data for each customer.
Integrating with more applications also allows HRIS and payroll systems to attract new customers by selling a product that will give employers the freedom and flexibility to use whatever supplemental point solutions they choose.
The Open Employment Ecosystem will benefit both large- and small-scale providers by lowering the costs associated with opening their APIs. Enterprise-focused providers will be encouraged to tap into SMB markets, where the investment risk has traditionally been considered too high. Meanwhile, SMB-focused providers will be empowered to compete with larger incumbents that have traditionally had a leg up given their larger pool of resources.
The lack of integrations with existing HR systems, particularly HRIS and payroll tools, is often a deal breaker for employers in the market for new point solutions. In order to grow their business, these applications need native integrations with employers’ sources of truth or risk a poor user experience and reduced product functionality.
The challenge is that it’s incredibly expensive to build and maintain these integrations, as every system of record has varying infrastructure, data formats, and governance. Many also require formal partnerships or other barriers to entry. In an Open Employment Ecosystem, these applications would be able to spin up integrations much faster, via API, and deliver greater value by eliminating manual administrative work for their customers. The applications can also focus their engineering teams on core or innovative product improvements, rather than building and maintaining integrations.
Today, many employers choose software based on compatibility with existing systems like HRIS and payroll or opt for all-in-one solutions instead of cherry-picking the tools that would best serve them. In fact, 97% of HR administrators say it's important for their employment systems of record to integrate with other tools in their tech stacks, and 84% say this connectivity is very or extremely important.
But with the connectivity enabled through an Open Employment Ecosystem, employers will be able to opt for the best rates, the lowest fees, the most impressive features, and the best user experience. And with the security, reliability, and automation of API integrations, HR admins will be freed from the administrative burden of manually sharing employee data with their service providers and updating records across disparate systems.
Moreover, this newfound choice and control over what employment data is shared and who gets access to it will enable employers to simplify onboarding, offer enticing benefits, protect sensitive information, and craft the best-in-class experience for their employees.
The concept of the Open Employment Ecosystem hinges on the shared infrastructure that connects all employment systems. At Finch, we’re building the foundation of that infrastructure.
Our Unified Employment API bridges the gap between systems of record and applications on behalf of employers. We’ve built integrations with hundreds of HRIS and payroll systems that use data standardization and clear rules of engagement for seamless syncing, so employee data is securely delivered to applications in a standardized format, regardless of its origin system.
The point solutions that use Finch’s product need only build one integration—to us—to unlock access to all of our HRIS and payroll connections. The systems of record that partner with Finch similarly benefit from access to pre-built integrations with Finch customers when both parties share a common employer.
When an application integrates with an HRIS or payroll system through Finch’s unified API, they get streamlined, permissioned access to the data they need, explicitly authorized by the employer. This eliminates the need for manual data entry, offering a more accurate, secure exchange of data for all parties—the employer, application, and system of record.
The rise of the Open Employment Ecosystem is the inflection point that will finally allow the employment sector to operate like other tech-forward industries. The benefits are too numerous to list, but they include easier access to employee benefits, greater insights into workforce trends, increased innovation, and far greater data security.
We believe the Open Employment Ecosystem is inevitable. The world is shifting towards standardized, open, and interconnected data systems. Employers and developers are prioritizing tools that offer greater flexibility and interoperability.
At Finch, we're leading the charge into this era of open and programmable employment. We kick-started this revolution with HRIS and payroll integrations; but to truly transform the employment landscape, we must extend beyond these core systems and integrate with new segments to unite the entire spectrum of employment tools.
Just as Twilio revolutionized communication and Plaid transformed finance, Finch is committed to reshaping employment by connecting the world of closed, complex, and archaic employment systems.
Learn more about the companies that make up the Open Employment Ecosystem by exploring our Market Map.
At a time when nearly half of the American households have no retirement savings, we can no longer rely on plan practices that were introduced 40 years ago. Today’s service providers are increasingly becoming aware that participation in retirement plans hinges on how easy it is to access and manage those plans—especially for small to midsize business (SMB) sponsors. This makes the 401(k) plan sponsor and participant experience vital for recordkeepers, third-party administrators (TPAs), and advisors.
A seamless user experience spans from sponsor onboarding to day-to-day plan management. Poor user experience often stems from cumbersome data access methods, largely because they slow everything down and make more work for everyone involved. Manual processes like SFTP have long burdened sponsors with unavoidable admin tasks, increased compliance risks, and dampened employee participation.
But change is on the horizon. Employer expectations are shifting rapidly. Plus, with SECURE 2.0 fueling the rise of SMB sponsors, recordkeepers are at a junction to redefine and automate operations to lighten the administrative burden on sponsors.
Delivering a top-notch 401(k) user experience is crucial. But to truly nail it, you need to understand what’s shaping plan sponsors’ expectations of their digital retirement service providers. These include:
SECURE Act 2.0 shook up the retirement game for sponsors, participants, and service providers alike. SECURE 2.0 aims to boost accessibility, bridge coverage gaps, and amp up individual retirement savings. With perks like auto-enrollment and expanded eligibility criteria, it's leveling up employer-sponsored plans. SECURE 2.0 also rolled out new plan types, like Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs), offering more options and coverage than ever before.
Recordkeepers who simplify auto-enrollment and contribution escalation and support new plans like PEPs are poised to attract more clients. Without these features, sponsors face the headache of manually enrolling employees and adjusting contributions every year. Any slip-up here can result in fines and penalties—which greatly reduces the user experience. Sponsors now want hassle-free plan setups and seek to be minimally involved in plan management. Recordkeepers that meet these demands will succeed in customer acquisition and retention in the long haul.
Federal incentives like startup tax credits and state mandates are pulling in a flood of new SMB sponsors to the retirement scene. Unlike big corporations with hefty HR departments, these smaller employers need more support from their recordkeepers and TPAs. Employees at these companies wear a lot of hats, so they have limited bandwidth to administer the plans, meaning they're eyeing recordkeepers who can lighten their load—especially with tasks like SFTP setups or payroll file uploads.
Plus, SMB sponsors are cost-sensitive, meaning they want top-notch service on a budget. To remain competitive and profitable, recordkeepers need to trim down their operational overheads while outsourcing much of the administrative work of these sponsors.
Related reading: Challenges of Managing Small Business Retirement Plans
Today, an average organization has more than 16 HR solutions in its tech arsenal. As the tool count climbs, employers are prioritizing integrations more than ever. In a recent survey of over 1,000 HR professionals, a whopping 97% said they want their systems to work seamlessly with others, and 51% confessed that juggling multiple employment systems throughout the day leaves them feeling overwhelmed, frustrated, or stressed. Today’s sponsors know that integrations can help them improve the employee experience as well as boost plan participation.
Streamlined compliance is crucial to keep 401(k) plan users happy. But manual processes, heavy workloads, and tricky regulations make it tough for sponsors and recordkeepers to stay compliant. Old-school methods like SFTP and manual file transfer don’t work in real-time. Both make compliance difficult by causing delays in data exchange, and manual methods like sharing data via email or tools like Dropbox are both insecure and increase the likelihood of typos and errors.
Compliance is even trickier under SECURE 2.0, with its complex plan designs and nuanced eligibility rules. Plus, retirement regulations are always changing, requiring constant monitoring and adaptation from recordkeepers. Any mistake, delay, or oversight can result in heavy penalties for sponsors and diminish their experience as users. It’s safe to say that recordkeepers need efficient, automated ways to minimize risk and manual tasks when sharing vital employment data.
Easier access to payroll data can solve nearly all of the challenges associated with plan management and enable recordkeepers to optimize the user experience.
Many forward-thinking recordkeepers are changing the game with API-based payroll integrations. These integrations let recordkeepers fetch data straight from sponsors' payroll systems, skipping all the manual steps.
API integrations have several advantages when it comes to improving 401(k) sponsor and participant experience. They can help recordkeepers:
To craft a winning user experience, recordkeepers need to start by simplifying the onboarding journey for sponsors. But it's no walk in the park. With employee census and payroll data locked away in their HR and payroll systems, recordkeepers either need to collaborate with both the sponsor and their payroll provider to establish an SFTP connection, or they need to rely on the sponsor to routinely download data from the payroll system and share the files in a timely manner.
Building SFTP connections can drag on for months, and manual file transfers are prone to delays and bad data. Recordkeepers need to implement a simple, more efficient way to make it easy for sponsors to authorize access to their employment data. A smooth onboarding process builds trust with sponsors from the get-go and paves the way for an exceptional user experience.
Related reading: How to Simplify 401(k) Sponsor Onboarding
Sponsors are over the manual grunt work that comes with managing a 401(k) plan, like data entry and creating CSV files to share with recordkeepers. Replacing antiquated data-sharing methods like SFTP with payroll API integrations enables recordkeepers to ease sponsors' workload, cutting down on admin tasks, eliminating constant back-and-forth, and streamlining data transfer.
By granting secure and direct access to their HRIS and payroll data through direct integrations, sponsors arm recordkeepers with the accurate and timely information they need to run the show efficiently. Better yet, API integrations are a one-time task for sponsors—once they’re granted access to the payroll system, the recordkeeper can pull all the data they need without ongoing involvement from sponsors.
Since SECURE 2.0’s passage, the 401(k) sponsor experience has become closely tied to how efficiently employees can be automatically enrolled into specific plans upon eligibility. This is also critical for increasing plan participation and engagement. Vanguard plans with automatic enrollment features had a 93% participation rate, compared to 70% for plans with voluntary enrollment.
But without payroll integrations, auto-enrollment gets dicey and cumbersome. New eligibility criteria for part-time and older employees introduced in SECURE 2.0 make this situation even trickier for recordkeepers that follow a manual approach. But with direct access to sponsors' data, recordkeepers can program their systems to spot when employees are eligible to join the employer's plan as well as send out automated notifications—further boosting the user experience of 401(k) sponsors and participants.
Even when the recordkeeper isn’t to blame, compliance penalties can have a harsh negative impact on the sponsor’s opinion of their provider. Manual data-sharing methods are rife with typos and errors; plus, the recordkeeper rarely has control over when they receive the data from the sponsor, which can adversely impact when contributions are made.
API integrations give recordkeepers the power to fetch all required data in real time, ensuring no eligible employee is overlooked and that their investment contributions are correct and made on time. With a 360° payroll integration, recordkeepers can even update deduction changes directly within the sponsor’s payroll system, reducing the risk of compliance slip-ups.
As user experience becomes a top priority in 401(k) plan management, recordkeepers must focus their efforts on delivering a standout digital experience. To do this, they need to first free up their operational and engineering bandwidth that is currently spent on inefficient manual processes and building technical bridges between systems. API integrations streamline regular data pulls from sponsors' HR and payroll systems. That way, the recordkeeper avoids otherwise manual tasks, including tracking down files, data validation, eligibility verification, enrollment, investment calculations, and so on.
Bottom line, integrating with sponsors' HRIS and payroll systems is no longer a choice, but a must for recordkeepers to operate faster and better.
However, building and maintaining API integrations with multiple payroll systems is costly, resource-heavy, and often not scalable. This limits recordkeepers’ ability to automate processes. Using integration tools like unified APIs to scale payroll integrations can help recordkeepers access data from hundreds of payroll systems with a single integration, reducing the time and cost associated with integration builds.
Unified APIs also help recordkeepers save further operational bandwidth by standardizing fetched data into a common, more manageable format that’s easier to work with. These benefits are ultimately paid forward to the users, creating a best-in-class experience for sponsors and participants alike.
Check out our latest whitepaper, "The Changing Retirement Landscape," to dive deeper into these industry trends and discover how recordkeepers can adapt and thrive in the era of SECURE 2.0.
Since its debut in 1978, the 401(k) plan has become a prized perk for big corporations to attract top talent. However, the steep setup and upkeep costs, administrative issues, and the lack of suitable small business retirement plans have since limited small and mid-sized business (SMB) employers’ ability to offer such plans. Today, while more than 90% of employers with 500+ employees offer a 401(k), the opposite holds true for those with fewer than 100 employees. Only a third of these companies offer their employees a 401(k) option.
Fortunately, the tides are turning. Recent legislative updates like SECURE 1.0 and 2.0 introduced several initiatives for SMB sponsors like Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs) and start-up tax credits. This sparked a wave of new SMB employers entering the retirement market, increasing the demand for personalized small business retirement plans.
While the influx of new sponsors is a positive development for retirement service providers like recordkeepers, third-party administrators (TPAs), and plan advisors, it also presents its own challenges. SMB sponsors often need extra support and watch their costs closely. Managing numerous small business retirement plans also adds to the workload of recordkeepers.
To succeed in this changing landscape, recordkeepers need to find innovative solutions and build efficient automated workflows to handle the increasing demands while maintaining profitability and steady growth. In this article, we'll explore the challenges of serving first-time SMB sponsors as a retirement service provider and how recordkeepers can serve them efficiently.
To reduce the coverage gap and manage small business retirement plans better, it’s crucial for recordkeepers and TPAs to understand what makes some small firms offer a 401(k) plan while others don’t. This involves considering factors like revenue stability, business size, 401(k) plan costs, and how much administrative work it takes to manage the plans.
Managing 401(k) plans for new small and medium-sized business (SMB) sponsors poses several challenges for recordkeepers, including:
Many small firms aren't familiar with the range of retirement plan options available to ease their cost and administrative burdens. While most know about 401(k)s, few are acquainted with SIMPLE, SEP, and MEP/PEP plans, and 72% reported being unaware of tax credits that could help offset the startup costs of launching a new plan. They also tend to overestimate the financial and time commitments needed to offer a plan.
Lack of awareness and misconceptions about retirement plans make SMB employers hesitant to start their own retirement plans. Although SECURE 2.0 aims to increase the number of SMB employers offering 401(k) plans, recordkeepers will need to put in significant effort to overcome the inertia in the untapped SMB market.
SMB sponsors often lack the know-how and resources needed to effectively support a retirement plan. From selecting the right plan to handling ongoing management, the prospect of starting a plan can overwhelm already busy business owners and small HR teams. In fact, 63% of SMB employers not offering retirement plans cite resource constraints as the reason.
Under this scenario, recordkeepers stepping in to assist small businesses must simplify routine activities like plan enrollment, compliance testing, contribution investment, and deduction management. They should also provide ongoing support to help sponsors navigate the complexities of 401(k) plans and stay abreast of regulatory changes with the necessary resources.
Small businesses are usually hyper-focused on costs. A lot of owners and HR managers assume that traditional retirement plans are too pricey and involve additional fees and hidden costs. In fact, about half of small businesses with 99 or fewer employees say they find it hard to afford retirement plans. Their cost sensitivity is further amplified due to the volatile cash flow of small businesses.
Recordkeepers aiming to help them out need to support modern plan options like PEPs to help new sponsors cut down administrative costs of setting up a plan. They also need to figure out better pricing models, innovative solutions, and operational strategies that balance making a profit with offering competitive rates and top-notch services.
Similar to big companies, small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs) have diverse employee demographics with varied financial goals. This leads SMB employers to seek personalized retirement plans akin to larger organizations. However, because of limited resources and budget constraints, achieving enterprise-level customization is often challenging for them.
To win more SMB businesses, recordkeepers need to tailor their services to suit these diverse needs and preferences. They need to adopt ingenious approaches, flexible systems, and automated processes that can accommodate a wide range of unique client needs at a lower cost.
As a whole, the retirement industry is still heavily reliant on outdated data-sharing methods for accessing sponsor payroll data. Currently, the most common method recordkeepers use is SFTP, which is manual and inflexible, like any file-based data-sharing method. This hands-on method adds more stress to sponsors who already lack the bandwidth to manage a plan. With SFTP, sponsors often need to routinely create, update, and share data files with recordkeepers to keep everything running smoothly.
On top of that, setting up SFTP connections is time-consuming and resource-intensive, which further burdens recordkeepers with manual tasks and extensive back-and-forth communication.
In this scenario, automated solutions like API integrations can be a superior alternative for recordkeepers to seamlessly access sponsor data from their payroll systems. However, the SMB payroll market in the U.S. is highly fragmented, with nearly 6,000 payroll providers, and only a few of them allow other applications to integrate directly. In fact, the vast majority of payroll providers either have a gated API or no API at all—adding to the pain of accessing payroll data.
With more SMB employers offering retirement benefits, the daily workload for recordkeepers’ Operations, Engineering, and Client Success teams is set to skyrocket. Balancing this surge in workload while maintaining service quality becomes paramount for recordkeepers striving to meet their clients' needs effectively. The current industry norm relies heavily on manual processes, from validating sponsor data to managing fund investments—adding friction to each step of plan administration. This leaves recordkeepers facing a crucial decision: substantially grow their Operations headcount or seek more efficient solutions.
To enhance their service delivery and better meet the needs of SMB sponsors, recordkeepers can take several steps. They can:
First and foremost, to effectively handle the growing workload, recordkeepers should prioritize automating tasks that are currently done manually: automatically enrolling employees based on eligibility, quickly determining what dollar amount to invest, and pushing changes directly back to the payroll system. This allows recordkeepers to reallocate Operations headcount to other teams and invest more resources into strategic initiatives like attracting new customers and improving their product offerings. Read our latest whitepaper to delve deeper into how recordkeepers can streamline the processes involved in managing 401(k) plans through automation.
Much of the manual labor involved in managing 401(k) plans revolves around creating and sharing data files with each pay period. To truly automate plan management, it's crucial to leverage innovative solutions that streamline data access. Recordkeepers can greatly benefit from using integration tools like unified APIs, which offer quick and reliable access to multiple payroll systems through a single integration.
Unified APIs also standardize data from various providers into a common format, making it easier to work with. Take Finch’s Unified API for instance, which integrates with multiple payroll providers, including niche, long-tail platforms tailored to serve small and mid-sized businesses. Automated integrations enable recordkeepers to automatically fetch income and deferral rates each pay cycle and seamlessly update deduction changes back to the payroll system without involving the sponsor—while significantly reducing engineering costs. Such efficiency greatly eases the burden on the recordkeeper’s Operations team and ensures a smooth user experience.
As mentioned earlier, many SMB sponsors don’t offer retirement plans because they aren’t familiar with the available options, incentives, and fiduciary responsibilities. Recordkeepers who can offer a better user experience, simplify plan setup and management, and reduce the administrative burden of already overworked HR teams will emerge as the most employer-friendly solutions and win the long game of customer retention and loyalty in an increasingly competitive U.S. retirement market.
Finch’s Unified Employment API streamlines operations for retirement and benefits providers by eliminating the need for manual data processing. It helps you spend less time building technical bridges and more time tailoring your product and services to better serve SMB sponsors. With access to over 200 payroll and HRIS systems powered through a single integration, Finch offers the widest and deepest coverage available—4x more than any other unified API. Schedule a call with our sales team to learn more, or try it yourself for free.
The retirement landscape in the U.S. is evolving rapidly. While an aging population is grappling with the possibility of outliving their savings, the average household retirement funds are falling significantly short of creating a safety net for future retirees. At the same time, the influx of tech-savvy Gen Z employees and legislation updates are changing sponsor expectations, highlighting the need for smooth digital experiences. Together, these shifts are driving the defining retirement industry trends of the moment.
We anticipate four key trends will shape the future of retirement for the next decade:
In this article, we'll explore these key retirement industry trends, their drivers, and what lies ahead for retirement service providers in 2024 and beyond.
Before diving into the top retirement trends, let's explore the key drivers behind this transformative shift:
The retirement crisis in the U.S. is starkly evident. In 2023, surveys showed that Americans feel they'll need around $1.27 million to retire comfortably. However, half of American households have no retirement savings at all. Among those who do, the savings are often insufficient, with less than $90,000 in retirement accounts on average. Over half of small to mid-sized business (SMB) employees lack access to a 401(k) plan, making it difficult to save for retirement through automatic payroll deductions. What’s more, 64% baby boomers today report moderate to high levels of stress about their retirement savings.
If not addressed soon, this crisis could result in a future in which many retirees heavily rely on government assistance programs. This strain on public resources could lead to increased taxes and budget deficits in the years to come.
To combat the impending retirement crisis, the federal government introduced several new pieces of legislation in recent years, including the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Acts 1.0 and 2.0. Some states have augmented the SECURE Acts with state-mandated retirement plans.
As these new laws aim to expand access to workplace retirement plans and boost individual retirement savings, they’ve introduced a host of new rules that affect plan eligibility, compliance standards, and plan designs. This is driving plan administrators to quickly adapt to the changing protocols and revamp their operations to stay compliant and profitable.
To reduce the coverage gap, SECURE 2.0 encourages SMB employers to start new 401(k) plans by offering several incentives like tax credits and Pooled Employer Plans (PEP). Naturally, these initiatives have led to a surge in first-time SMB sponsors looking to set up retirement plans. But unlike larger enterprise organizations, they don’t have dedicated HR teams to execute these plans. As a result, SMB employers are searching for plan administrators that make sponsoring a plan as easy as possible. They are on the lookout for retirement solutions that can handle admin tasks and work seamlessly with their existing payroll tools—payroll integrations are the primary motivator for one-third of plan sponsors seeking to work with a digital recordkeeper.
In addition to painless administration, today’s sponsors have greater expectations when it comes to their 401(k) plans—they expect greater personalization in their retirement plans as well as a tailored and targeted experience for their employees throughout the life of the plan. This demand is likely to grow as tech-savvy Gen Z participants account for a larger and larger share of the workforce.
To effectively respond to the needs of the hour, plan administrators need to watch out the four major retirement industry trends we previously mentioned, which impact compliance, sponsor experience, automation, and connectivity.
The first major trend that will affect plan administrators in the next few months is the increasing difficulty to stay compliant, owing mainly to SECURE 2.0.
SECURE 2.0’s focus on participant eligibility will push administrators to rethink how they handle compliance. For example, Section 101 of SECURE 2.0 mandates automatic enrollment for all participants, while Sections 125 and 603 introduce new criteria for part-time employees and catch-up contributions—making eligibility checks more critical and complex.
This means more data will be shared between sponsors and administrators than ever before. Recordkeepers need to stay sharp on eligibility changes and set up automated workflows to quickly enroll participants to avoid falling out of compliance by accidentally leaving out newly eligible employees.
Note: Read our latest whitepaper to learn how plan administrators can use automation to improve compliance under SECURE 2.0.
The proliferation of SMB sponsors, coupled with the changing expectations of sponsors of all sizes, are driving a greater focus on customer-friendly retirement services and technology to gain a competitive edge in the rapidly growing retirement market.
Employers are going to pick retirement service providers based on the types of plan they support and how much of the administrative work they can outsource. Plan features like automatic enrollment, self-service tools, faster onboarding, payroll integrations, and on-demand customer support are going to be top priorities for sponsors.
Needless to say, recordkeepers and third-party administrators (TPAs) that offer significantly better service to their clients will win the long race of new customer acquisition and increased customer loyalty. However, this is likely to put a strain on the plan administrator’s Operations, Engineering, and Customer Success teams to improve user experience and operational efficiency.
Under these circumstances, all plan administrators need to quickly scale their operations to keep up with the compliance changes and shifting sponsor expectations. They will be required to move on from the status quo of manual admin work and automate much of the day-to-day operations, from validating sponsor data and automatic enrollment to investing funds and automated deduction updates. In fact, studies show that 93% of advisors agree working with a tech-forward recordkeeper will make it easier to manage their plans.
Hiring to keep up with an increasing workload isn’t scalable or sustainable, so plan administrators will be driven to invest in technologies like API-based payroll integrations to operate more efficiently. The need for tools that provide reliable, accurate, and automatic access to participant and deferral data will continue to rise as manual data-gathering methods like SFTP fail to keep up with the rising automation needs of plan administrators.
The U.S. retirement industry is witnessing a growing demand for better connectivity. Today, employers, as users, demand greater connectivity between the tools in their technology stack, including retirement systems. Our 2023 survey of over 1,000 HR professionals found that 97% expect their systems to integrate with other tools, and half of them feel stressed by switching between tools all day.
Moreover, as technology evolves and new regulations like SECURE 2.0 focus more on participant engagement, it’s becoming increasingly important for sponsors, their payroll providers, and plan administrators to easily connect and share data in real time to simplify enrollment, investment monitoring, and drive engagement.
These new demands will continue to push plan administrators to adopt new technologies that offer increased connectivity and streamline the user experience, even within a highly fragmented U.S. payroll market.
SECURE 2.0 is only the beginning of a wave of legislative changes headed our way. According to predictions at this year's NAPA Summit, we can expect more significant legislation like the Automatic IRA Act of 2024 that’ll continue to shape plan requirements and eligibility criteria over the next decade, impacting everyone involved—from advisors and sponsors to TPAs and recordkeepers.
It's a dynamic time for the industry, and staying informed and adaptable will be key for all stakeholders. Investing in new technology is the number one way for recordkeepers—and really, any business offering retirement services—to thrive in this evolving landscape. To learn more about these trends and get actionable tips on how to adapt, check out Finch’s latest whitepaper: The Changing Retirement Landscape: How 401(k) Recordkeepers Can Thrive Under SECURE Act 2.0.
Sean Kelly is a seasoned retirement executive with more than 25 years of experience in the industry. Throughout his career, Sean has influenced every angle of 401(k) management, from plan administration to contribution oversight. He has served as VP, Head of Sales at Goldman Sachs Advisor Services, VP of Retirement Services at Fulton Bank, and Director of Retirement Solutions at WisdomTree. Today, Sean is a Senior Growth Partner for the Pension Resource Institute and a retirement industry consultant.
The biggest retirement advisors conference of the year took over Nashville last week, with more than 2,500 industry insiders descending on the Music City for three days of learning and networking.
I joined the Finch team at the NAPA 401(k) Summit this year, where we met with dozens of advisors and sat in on the sessions and workshops they attended. We brought back plenty of insights and anecdotes about what advisors are worried about, what they’re looking for in the recordkeepers they work with, and how they’re thinking about the future of retirement.
Here are my three biggest takeaways from NAPA 2024.
It’s no surprise that the latest federal legislation affecting the retirement industry was front and center at NAPA this year—after all, SECURE 2.0 takes full effect in a few weeks. But it was also clear that SECURE was only the beginning.
New legislation that would amend SECURE 2.0 is already in the works—both to close the loophole that could have eliminated catch-up contributions and to expand startup tax credits to employers joining existing plans. On top of that, the Automatic IRA Act of 2024, introduced as a bill in February, would require employers with 10 or more employees that don’t sponsor a retirement plan to automatically enroll employees in IRAs or other automatic contribution plans.
The bottom line is that we’re poised to see continued changes to plan requirements over the next several years that have the potential to impact compliance and eligibility rules, affecting not just advisors, but recordkeepers and TPAs as well. All retirement stakeholders need to ensure they’re prepared to adapt—not just to adhere to SECURE 2.0, but to navigate a period of continuous change over the next decade.
Several of the sessions at this year’s conference focused on Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs), the new plan structure introduced by SECURE Act 2.0. Across the board, attendees seemed to agree on two things:
PEPs were created to encourage small and mid-sized businesses to offer retirement benefits by allowing them to pool their plans, offsetting the plan administration costs; but with smaller asset pools to manage, advisors voiced concerns about how best to charge sponsors.
At least one session panelist offered a new perspective to advisors struggling with small-sponsor plans: it’s a volume play. He suggested that advisors look not at the incremental gains from each plan, but rather the benefits of amassing a large portfolio of small plans, and encouraged the audience to “do your part” to keep the retirement industry private.
So, how does this matter to recordkeepers? In order to take on a large number of PEPs and other small plans, advisors will seek to minimize their management responsibilities with these plans. That means they’ll prefer to work with recordkeepers that reduce the advisor’s involvement—both by easing the burden on the sponsor and by providing hassle-free access to sponsors’ data.
Simply put, as advisors look for ways to profit off of small plans, they’ll increasingly begin referring sponsors to recordkeepers that automate more of the work of plan administration.
The need for better payroll integrations was a common theme I heard across the exhibition floor and in breakout sessions throughout the conference. All of these conversations boiled down to one of two key needs among advisors:
Most of the time, it’s not the recordkeeper holding critical information behind lock and key, but rather a compounding problem—the recordkeepers are also struggling to collect the data they need from sponsors. Without reliable payroll integrations, recordkeepers spend countless hours going back and forth with the sponsors and validating and standardizing data, which makes it difficult to share clean, timely data with advisors.
The advisors I spoke with shared that one of their biggest challenges is finding recordkeepers that integrate with their sponsors’ existing payroll providers, since sponsors are typically adamant about keeping their existing payroll solution.
Advisors seemed agnostic to the nuts and bolts of how the payroll integrations worked or whether they were built in-house or powered by a third party, as long as the flow of data from sponsor to recordkeeper was fast and accurate.
This year’s conference focused heavily on the three major trends shaping the future of retirement, all of which are primarily being driven by new legislation: changes to compliance regulations, a renewed focus on the sponsor experience, and the increasing adoption of automation.
Finch dives into each of these trends—and offers tips for how recordkeepers can best adapt—in its latest white paper, The Changing Retirement Landscape: How 401(k) Recordkeepers Can Thrive Under SECURE Act 2.0.
And if you’re attending the Broadridge 360 Advisor Conference May 19-21, come see me! Find me ahead of time on Linkedin.
Finch's Unified Employment API allows 401(k) recordkeepers to integrate with hundreds of payroll providers, enabling streamlined sponsor onboarding, automated enrollment, and seamless deductions management. Learn more about our solutions for retirement administrators.
Like any regulated industry, the retirement field is thick with jargon and complicated nuance. Even pros that have been in the business for a long time have to keep up with ever-changing legislation and technology terms to stay ahead of the curve.
We've meticulously created this retirement glossary to be your go-to resource for mastering fundamental terms related to savings plans, compliance regulations, 401(k) payroll integrations, and beyond. Whether you need a quick refresher on common retirement terms or you're diving into the retirement industry for the first time, this guide will provide you with the knowledge you need to make informed decisions and strategic adjustments.
Let’s get started.
Plan sponsors are entities, generally employers, that offer retirement plans to their employees.
Employees contributing to and receiving benefits from retirement plans are plan participants. Beneficiaries or dependents who are nominated by the employee to receive benefits are also considered plan participants.
Plan administrators are the parties responsible for overseeing the day-to-day operations of 401(k) plans for participants and beneficiaries. While the employer could be the administrator, the work is often outsourced to a third party. Responsibilities of plan administrators include:
Third-party administrators, or TPAs, are companies that provide qualified retirement plan administration services to employers. They typically oversee transactions, handle the documentation requirements and legal compliance of running a retirement plan, and offer guidance on the plan design. TPA responsibilities include:
401(k) recordkeepers manage retirement plan records, including participant details, payroll data transfers (like employee deductions and employer matches), and notice distribution. They act as bookkeepers tracking funds, contributions, loan payments, tax deferrals, and rollovers. The recordkeeper is the employee-facing element of retirement plans, providing the website for participants to access their accounts. Recordkeeping services are offered either as standalone services or bundled with TPA services.
The custodian for a 401(k) plan acts like a bank. They handle fund transfers, payments, and asset safekeeping in a 401(k) plan. They don't provide investment advice. While the plan administrator or a TPA monitors these transactions to keep compliant, the custodian is the entity that actually holds assets and invests the funds in a plan.
In 401(k) plans, key employees are crucial business figures with significant ownership or decision-making roles. According to the IRS, key employees must fulfill at least one of the following criteria:
Retirement plan participants are divided into two buckets: highly and non-highly compensated employees. The IRS defines a highly compensated employee as any individual who either:
Businesses must identify HCEs for 401(k) plans to pass IRS-mandated non-discrimination tests and keep their deferrals within permissible limits.
What is a Highly Compensated Employee (HCE)?
A non-highly compensated employee or NHCE is any employee that doesn't meet the highly compensated employee (HCE) criteria required by non-discrimination testing.
When plan participants withdraw funds from their retirement accounts, it's termed distribution. Most distributions are taxable by the IRS based on the participant's tax bracket. There are different types of distributions based on the type of retirement plan and the timing of the distribution. For example:
Many rules govern retirement plan distributions, with financial penalties for noncompliance. For instance, withdrawing funds from a tax-advantaged retirement plan before reaching eligibility age often triggers penalties, except in select circumstances.
A rollover occurs when plan participants transfer all or part of their 401(k) balance from a previous employer's plan to a new retirement plan or IRA within 60 days. Rollovers are typically tax-free unless the rollover is to a Roth plan. Typically, recordkeepers are responsible for overseeing rollovers in a retirement plan, making it simpler for employees to manage and track their retirement investments while offering greater control over assets.
While participants own their contributions immediately, employer contributions to qualified retirement plans often follow a vesting schedule defined in the plan document. This schedule determines when participants gain full non-forfeitable ownership rights to the plan assets.
Employers implement vesting schedules to encourage employees to stay with the company longer. Typically, these schedules span three to five years, ensuring that all employees are fully vested by the time they reach normal retirement age or before the plan ends.
Form 5500 is an annual document prepared by plan sponsors. It discloses sponsor details and organization data like participants’ legal names and employer identification numbers (EIN), and plan details like plan characteristics, assets, fees, and eligible employees to the IRS and Department of Labor. Sponsors usually hire TPAs for this job. Meeting this filing requirement is crucial to staying transparent and compliant with regulations.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), established in 1974, is a federal law that requires plan administrators to provide participants with information about the plan, comply with fiduciary responsibilities, offer legal protections, and more. The law mandates that plan providers uphold specific standards, such as:
Under ERISA, entities that are involved in retirement plan management—including plan sponsors, administrators, and investment advisors—must fulfill several fiduciary responsibilities:
Notably, fiduciary responsibilities only include the standards to be followed for carrying out the plan functions, not the results. For example, fiduciaries are not responsible for the degree of success of a plan investment as long as they ensure a well-diversified investment portfolio and follow a prudent process for documenting and communicating plan activities.
According to ERISA, a plan fiduciary is any entity that has discretionary authority and control over the management and administration of retirement plans and investments. Based on their roles, fiduciaries can fall into three categories:
Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act, enacted in December 2019, aims to address Americans’ lack of retirement savings by making retirement savings plans accessible to more employees.
Updated in December 2022, SECURE 2.0 introduced several new rules to encourage wider plan adoption and enhance retirement security. Some of the mandates with the biggest impacts on 401(k) plan administrators are:
SECURE 2.0 Overview for Plan Providers
Section 603 Implementation Plan
401(k) Recordkeeper’s Guide to SECURE Act 2.0 Start-up Tax Credits
Non-discrimination testing, required by the IRS, assesses whether all employees have equal access to a retirement plan. It requires that key employees and highly compensated employees (HCEs) stay within a specific contribution rate, which is determined by the contribution rate of non-highly compensated employees (NHCEs). Non-discrimination testing involves several assessments:
Non-discrimination Testing: 401(k) Compliance
Employer-sponsored retirement plans operate by automatically deducting a portion of an employee's earnings from each paycheck and placing it into a retirement fund. Employers can also pitch in, either matching a fraction of the employee's contributions or making a fixed contribution. There are different variations of employer-sponsored retirement plans like 401(k)s, defined benefit plans, simplified employee pension (SEP), etc. These often come at minimal or no cost to employees and provide significant tax benefits to employers.
A defined benefit plan, more commonly known as a pension, is an employer-sponsored retirement plan that guarantees a specified monthly payout for employees at retirement. This can be a fixed dollar amount or calculated based on factors like salary and years of service. Most defined benefit plans are protected by federal insurance from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).
Defined contribution plans are voluntary employer-sponsored retirement plans that allow tax-deferred contributions from employees and employers. Each pay period, a fixed percentage of the employee's pay goes into their retirement account, with these funds being invested on their behalf.
However, unlike defined benefit plans, defined contribution plans do not promise a specific benefit, and the plan's value can fluctuate based on investment performance. Examples of defined contribution plans include 401(k), 403(b), employee stock ownership plans, and profit-sharing plans.
Among all the employer-sponsored defined contribution plans, 401(k) is the most popular. 401(k) plans enable employees to save for retirement through payroll deductions. Employees can choose to defer a portion of their salary (up to a set limit) into the plan before taxes, which is then invested on their behalf. Employers may also match employee contributions, making it a valuable retirement savings tool.
While 401(k) plans are available to employees of for-profit, private organizations, 403(b) plans, also dubbed tax-sheltered annuity plans, are a defined contribution option for eligible employees in public schools, churches, and tax-exempt organizations under Code Section 501(c)(3). Like 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans allow employees to defer money from their paychecks, with the added perk of potential employer matching contributions.
The SIMPLE IRA Plan (Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees) is a tax-deferred retirement plan tailored for small businesses with fewer than 100 employees. Similar to 401(k) plans, employers have the option to match employee contributions that go into individual retirement accounts (IRAs) or annuities. However, SIMPLE IRA plans typically have lower contribution limits compared to larger employer-sponsored plans like 401(k).
Simplified employee pension (SEP) plans offer employers of any size, including self-employed individuals, the opportunity to contribute to traditional IRAs set up for their employees. With lower start-up and operational costs than other workforce retirement plans, SEPs allow employers to contribute up to 25% of each employee's pay, up to a limit of $66,000 in 2023. Contributions are tax-deductible, and investments grow tax-deferred until retirement. Notably, SEPs only permit employer contributions.
A multiple employer plan (MEP) is a retirement savings arrangement where multiple employers participate in a single plan, typically sponsored by a professional employer organization (PEO) or an association. By sharing a common affiliation, such as membership in an association or engagement with a PEO, participating companies collectively enjoy several benefits, such as:
However, customization options are limited compared to single employer plans.
Introduced by SECURE Act 2.0, pooled employer plans (PEPs) are a variation of multiple employer plans (MEPs). In a PEP, participating employers delegate all administrative responsibilities to a designated pooled plan provider (PPP, or P3) acting as a 3(16) fiduciary. Unlike traditional MEPs, PEPs don't require participating employers to share a common affiliation.
Key Points:
A safe harbor 401(k) plan is a tax-advantaged retirement option that requires the employer to make tax-deductible contributions on their employees’ behalf, either through a match of the employee’s contributions or through a non-elective contribution. The funds must also be fully vested at the time of contribution. These plans help employers automatically pass the IRS-mandated non-discrimination tests and allow employees to contribute the maximum permissible amount to their 401(k) accounts.
The Roth 401(k) is an employer-sponsored retirement plan allowing contributions to be made after taxes. Contribution limits mirror those of traditional 401(k) plans, while qualified participants enjoy tax-free withdrawals upon retirement.
Catch-up contributions, established by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA), enable individuals aged 50 or older to exceed the usual contribution limit as they approach retirement. In 2023, eligible employees could contribute an extra $7,500 annually to qualified retirement plans like a 401(k) or 403(b).
SECURE Act 2.0 introduced new rules for catch-up contributions:
How to Prepare for Section 603 of Secure Act 2.0: An Implementation Plan
Automated payroll processing uses technology to streamline payroll calculations, management, and payment distributions. This modern approach to payroll offers numerous advantages:
Inefficient data handling practices can lead to errors in eligibility checks, documentation, or contribution management—resulting in compliance issues and penalties. Error handling or plan error correction involves identifying and rectifying all the inconsistencies in employer-sponsored retirement plans. For information on common 401(k) mistakes, solutions, and prevention, check out the IRS's 401(k) Plan Fix-It Guide.
Automatic enrollment is a mandate stipulated under Section 101 of SECURE Act 2.0 that requires employers to enroll eligible employees in qualified retirement plans by a specified date unless they opt out.
Section 101 is effective beginning January 1, 2025, which means that 401(k) and 403(b) providers must soon put in place and test the technology they will need to automatically enroll and increase the contributions of millions of participants. Failure to do so correctly and on time could result in noncompliance, stiff fines, and legal fees associated with disputing any penalties in court.
What Retirement Plan Providers Need to Know about Secure Act 2.0 Section 101
Eligible automatic contribution arrangement (EACA) is a method for automatically enrolling employees in 401(k) plans. Unlike basic automatic enrollment, EACAs:
401(k) payroll integrations allow recordkeepers or plan administrators to access the data held within the sponsor’s payroll system and facilitate seamless data exchange between systems. Integrating payroll systems with 401(k) plans streamlines plan management by:
Guide to 401(k) Payroll Integrations
Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) is a method that uses shell encryption to securely send and receive sensitive information, like employment data, between businesses using a shared server. SFTP involves preparing data in a flat file format (like CSV or JSON), encrypting it, and then transmitting the files through a secure connection between two platforms. While SFTP is the most commonly used data-sharing method in the retirement industry, it requires a long, expensive setup process, cannot facilitate real-time data exchange, and is prone to errors caused by human intervention.
APIs, short for Application Programming Interfaces, act as bridges that enable communication between two different applications. They create a standardized pathway for two softwares—such as a payroll system and a recordkeeping platform—to exchange data and information, regardless of the programming languages they're built on. API integrations offer the same security as SFTP as well as near-real-time data access, but eliminate the need for time-consuming manual processes.
SFTP vs API: Which Integration Method is Best for Employment Data?
Payroll APIs are simply APIs that are specific to payroll systems. They offer:
Unified APIs are a technology layer that provides access to many different applications and systems through a single API integration. Unified API providers sell pre-built connections to a multitude of applications within a category of software, meaning that users need only build one integration to the unified API provider to access the data within all of the systems the unified API has connections to. Unified APIs are standardized, meaning that all the data that flows through the API arrives in the same format, regardless of its origin. They’re an alternative to building dozens or hundreds of integrations in-house, which require high upfront capital investment, lengthy building periods, and long-term maintenance.
Build vs Buy: Leveraging Employment Data Via HRIS and Payroll Integrations
The employment ecosystem is the collection of B2B software providers that employers use to manage their workforce. The ecosystem is vast, but any system that touches employment data is part of the employment ecosystem. These companies fall into 2 main categories:
A unified employment API is a vertical-specific unified API focused on the employment ecosystem. Unlike generalized unified APIs, unified employment APIs offer targeted market coverage, deeply granular data sets, and both read and write functionality to developers that require expertise in the employment ecosystem—along with the typical features of a generalized unified API.
These APIs are best suited for B2B products where the end users have administrative access to employment systems, such as HR admins, people operations professionals, benefits managers, or even finance team members. These users can then authorize a secure connection to key sources of employment data housed in their HRIS or payroll system. Developers can then leverage that data to create deeply integrated and personalized solutions for their customers.
The Emergence of Unified Employment API
API authentication is vital in retirement technology to confirm users' identities when accessing sensitive employment data. Authentication is the process of verifying the identity of a user making an API request. It involves presenting credentials such as a username and password, API key, or digital token, which are then accepted or rejected.
Various authentication protocols, such as API keys, JSON Web Token (JWT), OAuth 2.0, user credentials, token-based authentication, and two-factor authentication protect sensitive data by reducing potential risks like data breaches, corruption, deletion, and denial of service (DoS) attacks.
However, authentication alone isn't sufficient for total security. It needs to be paired with authorization, which determines the level of access users should have based on their credentials.
Data mapping is the process of reconciling data from different API endpoints to seamlessly sync data between systems. Even if two fields contain the same information, they might be named or structured differently. The process involves literally “mapping” two distinct data fields that hold the same information to one another, so the data can be automatically synced.
For example, when handling "employee address" in two different HRIS, what's referred to as 'location' in one system might be called 'residence' in another, causing confusion and making it harder to use the data. Data mapping involves training the API integration to recognize that the data held under ‘location’ in one system should sync with the data field called ‘residence’ in the other.
Data mapping can be tedious, especially when dealing with multiple APIs from different providers. This is where a unified API can help—it lets vendors map data from different providers to one common model. Users can then request data from various providers without fretting over their differences.
Data inconsistency among payroll systems can occur due to different data storage protocols followed by different providers. Data standardization normalizes data formats across endpoints to prevent loss of data due to mapping errors. Recordkeepers often opt for unified APIs for standardizing data obtained from multiple HRIS and payroll systems.
Data synchronization is the process of automatically updating data changes between two or more systems to maintain consistency. Frequent and timely data synchronization is vital for effective collaboration and compliance. Most automated API integrations sync data every 24 hours but will allow users to sync the data on demand.
Encryption is the practice of disguising sensitive data in transit so it cannot be intercepted or accessed by unauthorized entities. In the retirement industry, end-to-end encryption protocols like AES 256-bit or TLS 1.2 are essential to safeguard sensitive employment data such as personal identifiable information (PII) and bank details and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
Visit the Finch Blog to learn more about the best practices and trends shaping the retirement industry and discover what the experts are saying.
Runae Lee is the Head of Partnerships at Finch. He’s spent years working in the human resources industry, where he’s seen first-hand the evolution of employment technology. At Finch, Runae leads our efforts to partner with leading HRIS and payroll providers as we work to create a more standardized and connected employment ecosystem.
Want to collaborate with us? Get in touch with our team and join industry leaders like Gusto, UKG, BambooHR, HiBob, and more.
I didn’t have “watch a live performance by Flo Rida with a cameo from Flavor Flav” on my 2024 bingo card, but that’s the thing about Transform—the HR conference of the moment is full of surprises.
Some Finch colleagues and I attended the Las Vegas event last week, where we got to talk shop, meet hundreds of like-minded HR tech professionals, and celebrate Finch being named a finalist in the Transform Awards’ Innovators category: “Transformative Tech of the Year.”
Most importantly, we came back energized and with fresh insights into the state of employment technology. Here are my key takeaways from Transform 2024.
Artificial intelligence, like many emerging technologies (crypto, Web3, 3D TVs, AR/VR, etc.), was a bit oversold last year, when seemingly all vendors added "AI-powered [fill in the blank]" to their marketing materials. That was scaled back a touch this year, as most tech companies refocused their attention on their core products, but there is no doubt in anyone's mind that AI is coming.
I had more than one friendly debate with other attendees in which I sided with the skeptics, but we all agreed that it’s critical we prepare our workforce for the fundamental changes AI will bring in the coming years. That means it’d be prudent to invest in the employees who are most likely to see their jobs disrupted by training them on new skills or upleveling their current strengths.
Bottom line, AI is having its “moment” with technologies like ChatGPT and DALL-E already in the hands of consumers; but the reality is, it's been around for years. It's already being used, but in ways that are behind the scenes and mundane. However, investment in AI is accelerating and undoubtedly creating the next wave of disruptive tech that will change the way we work and play. Let's start preparing for that future.
A slew of employment technologies across various verticals, from people analytics to ATS, have recently launched their own HRIS: Chartop, Workable, and Lattice to name a few. Seemingly a trend, it begs the question—why?
I have a few theories.
First of all, HRIS is easier to build than a full-fledged payroll system. But alongside payroll, HRIS has true platform power. Point solutions need to be in sync with systems of record like BambooHR or HiBob, since they also house important employee data. So it would make sense that these point solutions want to bring HRIS in-house to deliver a more seamless, unified experience to customers.
In speaking with these companies, a recurring theme became abundantly clear: customers who are fanatical about your products and services want you to solve more of their problems. Tech companies are very sensitive to customer pain, and will build adjacent products where there is strong demand and where they feel confident that they can deliver something unique and truly special.
This one wasn’t much of a surprise, but it’s worth mentioning just how much this concept permeated the entire conference. Long gone are the days where integrations were a value-add. Employers want modern solutions, and every vendor touts their "seamless" and "automated" workflows to attract new buyers. This means that today’s leaders need to adapt their integration and API strategies to fend off new-age, tech-forward upstarts that feature integrations out of the box for customers.
For many of the new solutions on the block, the SMB segment is still paramount; but all big companies started out small, and as the winning SMBs grow, even the tech-forward platforms will likely need to look to outside solutions like Finch to continue scaling their integrations and expanding upon the integrated experiences they offer to their customers.
This probably won’t come as a surprise to any seasoned venture capital folks, but it was definitely a strong learning for me. I attended several VC panels during Transform, and at least one of the speakers noted something that stuck with me: Products change over time; founders do not.
Their point was that when investors are evaluating a company, what they’re also asking themselves is if they believe in the people that are building the product. You can’t exactly fire a founder. Meeting in person is crucial, because it helps both parties gauge each others’ personalities and the other intangibles that don’t stand out on a Zoom call or in a slidedeck.
This doesn’t only apply to VC. Meeting remotely is fine, but there’s something electric about meeting prospects, customers, or partners in person that we need more of. We all want in-person events to come back because there’s no better way to build rapport and trust.
A conference is a conference is a conference—until it’s not. Transform really took the monotonous and breathed some life into it. I was so invigorated by the passionate group of People leaders and early stage founders in attendance, from CHROs and their teams to CEOs pounding the pavement for their companies with fire in their bellies (and probably too much caffeine).
To put it simply, Transform just had good vibes. Who could argue with a welcome reception complete with hors d'oeuvres served under a massive tent and a live drum line?
While we eagerly await Transform 2025, our team is busy preparing our conference schedule for the next few months. If you’re attending the NAPA 401(k) Summit or SHRM Annual Conference, swing by our booth to say hi and learn about Finch’s Unified Employment API. Or try it yourself for free.
A lack of integrations between your product and other software-as-a-service (SaaS) tools can be a dealbreaker for potential customers. In Gartner's 2023 report, B2B buyers ranked integration with their existing tech stack as the third most crucial factor in provider selection. To stay competitive, companies are increasingly turning to integration partnerships.
Simple integrations aren’t enough. Today’s customers demand seamless data exchange, but they also expect customizability and that the features of each tool will work in harmony to create a whole greater than the sum of its parts. Integration partnerships lay the foundation for creating this kind of user experience.
In this article, we'll discuss everything you need to know about building successful integration partnerships—from how to choose the right partner and best practices to common challenges and how to overcome them. We'll also answer some frequently asked questions.
Let's dive in.
Partnerships don’t always involve integrations, and vice versa. Software providers can form partnerships with one another for a variety of reasons—to cross-promote their solutions or share resources, like splitting the cost of a co-branded industry report. Similarly, two companies can integrate their applications through an open API under developer terms and conditions governing use.
An integration partnership is the combination of a formal business relationship and a software integration between systems. These partnerships can support stronger, more strategic integrations and formalize a working agreement between both companies that empowers both to grow.
Companies that offer distinct but complementary services and share the same ideal customer profile (ICP) will partner to blend services, technologies, and resources that make both products stronger and enhance the customer experience. This offers a distinct advantage over competitors whose products don’t work with the other tools in their customers’ tech stacks.
Often, integration partnerships also involve cross-promotion efforts—they may list each other on their product marketplaces, share leads, or establish referral programs to mutually grow one another’s business.
A good integration partnership opens new revenue opportunities and fosters business growth for both parties in several ways:
The ultimate goal of integrations and partnerships between SaaS applications boils down to driving more revenue, which is achieved through better products and an elevated customer experience. Integration partnerships can add to your bottom line in several ways:
Integrations help applications improve their product offering and automate workflows. This increases the utility of your app—making it integral to your customer’s tech stack and difficult to replace.
For instance, tax credit platform MainStreet uses Finch to integrate with their customers’ payroll and HR systems, which allows MainStreet to programmatically pull the data they need from each customer in moments. This means the end user no longer has to get on a support call with MainStreet to integrate their payroll system, dramatically improving the user experience.
When two companies establish an integration partnership, they may be able to offer more useful integrations by collaborating on use cases and common customer requests.
Establishing strong partnerships with industry leaders can bolster your company’s reputation, potentially paving the way for future partnerships. These partnerships can include referral agreements that send leads to your company when your partner has a customer who would benefit from your solution.
Integration partnerships also lead to co-selling opportunities by creating a bespoke solution that combines both companies’ strengths. For example, last year Workday and ADP announced an extended partnership to improve data visibility between systems and provide a technology-first experience to their joint customers.
The bottom line is that building integrations and creating strong, lasting partnerships can offer both direct and indirect benefits that will help your business to grow.
Given their time and resource-intensive nature, whether or not to enter an integration partnership is a strategic business decision that should be made carefully and depends on how important the use case is to your ideal customer.
You should consider opting for an integration partner in the following scenarios:
While the details may differ by industry, the general process for building integration partnerships is roughly the same. Here's what a standard integration partnership process entails:
The first step is finding a potential partner and starting the conversation. Many vendors have an established partner program and an intake form on their website; others may require more direct outreach to Partnership or other company executives. Be prepared to explain what you’re looking to accomplish and how a partnership would benefit you both.
Next, you need to outline how you want to collaborate, which may include setting timelines and goals and agreeing to both technical and commercial terms. Some common conversations at this stage include:
Most companies will have a standard set of legal contracts, such as NDAs, licensing agreements, terms of use, privacy contracts, liability and indemnity clauses, and so on. These contracts clearly define ownership, intellectual property usage, and risk mitigation clauses.
Once all parties are in agreement, the engineering teams can begin testing technical compatibility, synchronizing data, and building the integration. In some cases, developers can leverage an integrations platform like Finch to eliminate the need to build a bespoke integration and go live with their partnership in much less time.
Now that the integration has been established, both companies can leverage the benefits of their new partnership, whether that’s through co-selling a robust solution, co-marketing the new integration features, advertising one another on their marketplaces, or whatever other benefits the partnership entails.
Remember: integrations and partnerships are distinct, and they’re not mutually inclusive—one can exist without the other. Applications can integrate with each other without a formal partnership, and partnerships can be established without ever connecting technologies.
When two companies form an integration partnership, they connect their applications and institute a formal agreement that leverages the integration to help both companies grow.
So, best practices for a successful integration partnership include best practices on both the technical side (the integration) and the business side (the partnership). The following best practices may apply on one end, the other, or both, as we’ll discuss below:
Integration partnerships require a lot of work to do well, so the first step is to choose the right partner—one that will offer long-term value to your business.
To choose the ideal partner, you’ll have some considerations that are specific to the integration, some that are specific to the partnership, and some that apply to both. We’ll explore the best practices based on where they fall on each side of this coin.
Once you’ve identified the right partner and both parties have agreed to work together, you’ll need to build trust to be effective partners.
Large organizations recruit entire partnership teams to effectively develop and maintain relationships. If you’re a smaller organization without a dedicated Partnership team, start by assigning partnership responsibilities to someone who can own the relationship with the partner organization. These Partner Managers play a pivotal role in maintaining healthy relationships between the companies—they’re responsible for identifying opportunities to drive mutual revenue and user growth with your partner.
There are two things to consider here: how the integration itself may be monetized, and how the partnership can lead to new revenue from customers.
Many SaaS tools charge direct and indirect fees to their partners, like API usage fees and flat partnership fees. In this case, one company or both may pay for the right to use the integration they’ve built. Be aware that while they’re common practice, API usage fees often lead to friction and frustration between the two parties.
On the other hand, the business partnership may include agreements to promote each other’s products, with incentives like referral bonuses or customer discounts. These formal agreements can help one or both companies grow their user base at a lower customer acquisition cost.
Separately, partners may engage in co-marketing commitments like co-hosting events, campaigns, and webinars, which typically don’t involve exchanging money. These collaborations can build mutual trust and goodwill while bringing each company new leads.
Partner onboarding can be helpful both for building the integration and defining the partnership. For example, you may exchange product walkthroughs so both you and your partner develop a better understanding of each product and how they can best work together before engineering the integration.
Once the integration is built, sharing enablement resources and marketing collateral as well as establishing support paths can help each partner to effectively serve shared customers and engage in cross-promotional efforts.
Integration partnerships, like any long-term relationship, require ongoing maintenance—both to the technical bridge and the human one. It’s good practice to assign dedicated points of contact to your partnerships—you may even establish routine meetings—to keep both parties on the same page about:
The dual nature of integration partnerships can make them especially taxing, because they require the effort of building the integrations and the effort of establishing and maintaining a business relationship.
Unified APIs like Finch can alleviate the strain on your team, empowering you to build integrations at scale. Instead of investing time, money, and resources in one-off integrations, companies that use Finch build just one integration to access hundreds of systems of record for HR and payroll. Finch’s Unified Employment API is intentionally focused on the employment ecosystem, but there are other unified APIs that serve additional markets and verticals.
Once you’re able to support connections to hundreds of providers through a unified API, you may choose to augment some of those connections with a formal partnership. In that case, unified APIs like Finch can speed these partnerships' time to launch by eliminating the technical element and giving your team the freedom to focus on building relationships and investing more heavily in your core product.
In short, you should consider a tool to leverage more integrations in the following scenarios:
Finding the right integration partner that is collaborative and fits your strategic roadmap can pose several challenges:
Negotiating legal contracts and commercial terms can take weeks or months to finish—often delaying time to market. This is especially difficult for startups or companies who want to go live with partnerships quickly and launch integrations with customers.
Some companies may require their prospective partners to undergo technical evaluations to ensure compatibility, security compliance, and adherence to data protection standards—this is especially true of systems of record that hold sensitive data like PII.
Many also require their partners to have a minimum number of shared customers before allowing them into the integration marketplace, which acts as a barrier to entry into the partnership ecosystem for early startups.
Most integrations are built through APIs. Integrating with a provider’s API is challenging for multiple reasons, including data mapping errors, API versioning, ongoing maintenance, and more. We expand on these hurdles in our article "Common Challenges of Building Multiple API Integrations."
Integration partnerships are often a source of additional revenue for systems of record. As a result, partners may charge a flat fee or incremental fees for API usage—adding to the monetary burden for budget-conscious companies.
A lot of time, energy, and resources go into building just one integration partnership. Companies that want to establish many integration partnerships face long timelines, tricky resource allocation decisions, and compounding long-term maintenance work—rendering it nearly impossible to scale without sufficient resources.
Few companies have a surplus of time, talent, and capital. Invest those precious resources in your partnerships and product by using Finch’s Universal Employment API to access integrations to 200+ HR and payroll systems.
Finch partners with industry leaders like Gusto, Paycor, Personio, UKG, and others, empowering innovators to focus on building their core product while leveraging our partner network to deliver a smooth user experience.
Talk to our sales experts or sign up for free.
Almost all successful integration partnerships involve the following:
Partnership efforts—identifying a partner, vetting them, developing outreach programs, building integrations, and implementing a shared go-to-market strategy—can take a few months to a few years.
Finch is a unified employment API that helps you scale HR integrations faster. You can unlock integrations with 200+ HRIS, directory, and payroll systems by building and maintaining just one integration with Finch. Finch also partners with multiple HR and payroll providers your customers use, including Gusto, Paycor, Personio, UKG, BambooHR, HiBob, and more. By leveraging Finch's extensive network, you can save months of integration-building efforts and reduce time-to-market while creating a more integrated, seamless customer experience.
Typically, integration partnerships involve:
To protect their customer data, sometimes applications will decline partnership offers if data and security standards are not met. It’s crucial to ensure you meet the technical requirements, such as encrypting data in-transit and at-rest, before entering into a partnership.
HRIS integrations are crucial for streamlining essential HR functions such as employee onboarding, performance management, benefits administration, compliance, etc. They also support broader business operations like accounting and enterprise resource planning (ERP).
Integrating operational tools with HRIS systems can eliminate the need for employers to switch between different applications. It also boosts the adoption of new SaaS tools and minimizes manual data entry errors.
In this article, we will explore what HRIS integrations entail, discuss popular use cases, and examine both the challenges and benefits associated with them. We will also touch upon the common methods for building and maintaining these integrations.
Additionally, we'll introduce how Finch allows you to unlock integrations with 200+ HR and payroll systems using just one API. Tools like Finch are especially valuable when dealing with the complexity of building three or more HRIS integrations.
Today, an average-sized organization utilizes 6-8 HR applications. This requires employees to spend significant time keeping their employment tech stacks up-to-date. Based on our research of 1000+ HR professionals, seven in ten HR admins (68%) say they routinely switch between different employment systems throughout the day. Half (51%) admit doing so leaves them feeling overwhelmed, stressed, annoyed, frustrated, or angry.
HRIS integrations facilitate seamless data exchange between the primary HRIS (housing employment records) and other software applications. This means that any changes made in one system will automatically appear in another, and actions in one application can trigger workflows in another. This reduces the need for employees to switch between apps frequently.
HRIS integrations fall into two main categories based on their purpose.
HR and payroll represent one of the most fragmented markets in the United States, boasting nearly 6,000 providers processing around $3 trillion in payroll annually for SMBs alone!
Adding to the complexity, the functionalities of HR systems vary widely among different providers. Some offer only HRIS or employee directories, while others provide a comprehensive suite encompassing HRIS, payroll, benefits, and collaboration tools.
As of 2023, Quickbooks, ADP Run, and Paychex Flex collectively hold over 40% of SMB payroll market share. However, newer tools like Gusto, Zenefits, and BambooHR leverage innovation and integrations to offer diverse HR, payroll, and benefits solutions to SMB employers through a single platform.
Note: Given the abundance of HR and payroll providers, it's essential for any company serving the SMB market to integrate with as many HR providers as possible.
Building a few integrations with the top five or ten HRIS may cover a decent portion of your customer base, but to serve the remaining half or tap into new regions and industries, you would need to build hundreds of other HRIS integrations. Needless to say, this is tremendously time and resource-intensive.
To address this coverage challenge, many employment tech companies seek solutions to streamline the development and management of HRIS integrations. If you're developing a solution that requires access to employment data from multiple sources, Finch’s Unified Employment API can unlock hundreds of HRIS integrations in as little as 3 days. Contact us.
Now, let's explore some common use cases of HRIS integrations.
Integrating an employer's HRIS with a payroll provider is the most efficient approach to handling payroll functions efficiently. Especially when an employer’s HRIS does not include a payroll module. This integration automates tasks such as setting up new employee payroll, tracking tax regulations, and managing benefits deductions based on employee directory data.
Providers of 401(k) plans, record keepers, or third-party administrators can integrate with an employer's HRIS and payroll systems. This integration streamlines auto-enrollment to retirement plans, facilitates seamless deductions management and yearly recordkeeping audits.
If an HRIS lacks benefits administration features, employers can connect with a benefits administration tool to automate employee enrollment, modifications, and cancellations. Learn more.
Recruitment tools, like applicant tracking systems (ATS) or background verification tools, often collaborate with HRIS’s to offer all-in-one talent acquisition solutions. This enables employers to manage recruitment tasks from a single platform. For instance, when a candidate's status changes to "Hired" in the ATS, HRIS integrations can automatically create the employee profile and trigger onboarding functions.
Compliance tools can use employee census details (job title, department, employment status, etc.) to build security training programs, auto-enroll employees, send periodic reminders, and update results directly to the HRIS, ensuring increased participation.
Also read: How Secureframe used HRIS integrations to simplify compliance for thousands of employers.
Tools like compliance, expense management, employee recognition, and identity management must stay updated with the latest employment details for accurate employee access. HR integrations ensure accurate access to employee records, making it easy to grant or remove user access to essential tools. This maintains compliance and reduces the risk of data leaks.
As soon as an employee joins, a series of onboarding workflows ensure that employees have access to all the equipment, software, and documents they need to get started on their first day at work. Effective employee onboarding also includes company orientation, training, and in some cases, specific certification processes. HRIS integrations automate these workflows by swiftly capturing employee details, eliminating the need for manual ticket generation. The same automated efficiency applies to the triggering of offboarding workflows.
Read: How tools like Trainual simplified employee onboarding with HRIS integrations.
Time tracking and leave management applications use HRIS integrations to automate hours worked and time off updates based on employee census data. This reduces HR admin workload by eliminating manual data syncs.
Integrating workforce management solutions with HRIS’s creates a centralized platform for daily tasks and performance management. For instance, HRIS integrations help employee engagement and performance management tools to track employment information like employee roles, organizational structure, manager information and use them to trigger relevant workflows.
Read: How employee rewards tool PerkUp launched HRIS integrations in a sprint.
Integrating learning management systems (LMS’s) with HRIS’s simplifies managing the professional development of employees. Customizing their learning experience based on employee data, such as role, department, and manager details, facilitates skill gap identification and discovery of training needs. Moreover, completion reports are automatically sent back to HRIS, allowing employers to stay informed about employee learning without manual effort. For example, with an LMS-HR integration, employees can be auto-enrolled in role-based learning programs following role changes or promotions.
Read: How accounting software Rillet leveraged HRIS integrations for better employer experience.
The most effective approach to building HRIS integrations depends on the number of integrations needed, the purpose of integration, scalability needs, engineering bandwidth, and budget. Common HRIS integration methods used by SaaS tools include:
Application programming interfaces or APIs serve as connectors for seamlessly exchanging information between different software tools. Custom-built API integrations simplify setting up automated triggers for custom HR workflows. APIs offer greater flexibility, personalization, and customization of the end-user experience. However, each integration requires significant development and partnership efforts, creating scalability issues. Moreover, any API changes require updates to HRIS integrations, adding complexity and fragility to this approach.
In recent years, new solutions like unified APIs have been developed to meet the demand for scalable API integrations. Unified APIs consolidate APIs of applications within a specific software category. This enables developers to connect with multiple platforms simultaneously. Also, these APIs standardize data from different applications into a common format, making it more accessible to developers.
For instance, Finch’s unified employment API simplifies integration with 200+ HRIS and payroll providers through one integration. Managing a single integration with Finch may prove to be the quickest and most cost-effective method for scaling HRIS integrations.
Some HRIS tools form partnerships with vendors to offer native integrations. However, these integrations are often limited in number, and the level of customer service may not be satisfactory. Additionally, accessing these integrations may involve extra fees.
Integration platform as a service (iPaaS) solutions help companies integrate HRIS platforms into their applications, streamline workflows, and facilitate data synchronization. iPaaS is a fairly low-code solution suitable for organizations with limited tech resources. But the process can be slow and challenging to scale. Plus, they are often tailored for specific use cases. If your needs do not perfectly match, this approach can be very limiting.
Point-to-point HRIS integrations, while cost-effective, are the least efficient option. They involve connecting an employer's HRIS with operational tools without using APIs or third-party solutions. These integrations are challenging to maintain and scale. Any change in one system requires adjustments to multiple connections. However, if the integration needs are minimal and a high level of personalization is essential, point-to-point integrations may be a viable solution.
Challenges in HRIS integrations involve maintaining data quality, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and consistency across multiple HR providers. These are crucial to avoid compliance and security issues. To address this challenge, establishing data standards is essential, ensuring compatibility among data from different sources.
Note: If you are building integrations with multiple HR systems, consider using a specific tool to normalize data into a common format to save significant engineering resources.
Many HR platforms lack public APIs, requiring a partnership agreement to access API keys, documentation, and sandboxes. These agreements often involve security checks, lengthy negotiations, and additional fees. Some providers even demand a minimum customer count before partnering, posing a challenge for resource-limited startups seeking essential integrations for their products.
Also Read: How to Build and Maintain Successful Integration Partnerships
Ongoing maintenance is vital for the accuracy and quality of integrated data, especially for customer-facing integrations. Key maintenance issues include:
Creating and maintaining 1:1 integrations demands a substantial investment of time and resources. The entire process, from planning and testing to development and ongoing updates—can consume hundreds of developer hours and tens of, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars annually for just one integration. Unfortunately, this approach lacks scalability, as resources dedicated to integration maintenance could be better utilized to enhance product features.
Refer to our whitepaper Build vs. Buy for a detailed discussion on the merits of building integrations in-house versus using a commercially available unified API.
When handling in-house HR integrations, scalability becomes a significant hurdle. Developers must delve into various providers' API/developer documentation, decode data intricacies, craft custom codes for each integration, test them, and offer indefinite support. Managing more than three integrations can become a monumental task. Leveraging an integration tool or API aggregator improves scalability, allowing you to concentrate primarily on product development projects
Also read: How equity management tool Carta scaled their integration strategy overnight with Finch.
HRIS integrations offer numerous advantages, reducing time, cost, and resource requirements for app developers while notably enhancing employer experience.
If you need to build multiple HRIS integrations, Finch offers a unified employment API that simplifies the process with a single integration. Finch provides a standardized data model, eliminating the need for developers to handle different data formats, development complexity, and API variations.
Please contact us if you are looking for a comprehensive HRIS integration solution.
If you are looking to automate payroll deductions, Finch can help. Talk to sales.
Payroll deductions refer to the money withheld from an employee's paycheck each pay period to cover taxes, benefit premiums, and other financial obligations. Whether you're a business establishing your payroll, a SaaS tool offering employee benefits, or an employee seeking clarity on paycheck adjustments, it's crucial to grasp the different types of payroll deductions and how they differ.
This article explores common payroll deductions, their legal requirements and addresses some frequently asked questions. Plus, for those involved in employee benefits, retirement, health insurance, and more, we have a bonus section that explains how to seamlessly adjust deductions within the employer's payroll system.
Now, let’s decode different types of payroll deductions one by one.
Payroll deductions involve subtracting money from an employee's total wages each pay cycle to cover both mandatory and voluntary employment expenses, including taxes, benefits, and garnishments.
Each deduction has distinct calculations, regulatory requirements, and is applicable in different scenarios.
The deduction amount depends on multiple factors like federal or state tax laws, withholding information supplied by the employee in their Form W4: Employee’s Withholding Certificate, and the benefits programs the employee is subscribed to. The calculation process can be manual or automated.
Some types of benefits deductions are taken out of a paycheck based on the written approval of the employee. However, statutory deductions and garnishments are withheld by the employer as mandated by law.
Here are the common payroll deductions to keep in mind if you are working for an employee benefits or payroll company that does business in the United States.
Mandatory deductions are commonly called withholdings. Some examples of statutory payroll deductions include state and federal taxes, wage garnishments, and FICA.
Employees can choose from various employer-offered benefits programs and agree to deductions from their paychecks on either a pre-tax or post-tax basis. These programs encompass 401(k) and retirement plans, health insurance, health savings accounts (HSA) and flexible spending accounts (FSA), life and disability insurance, commuter benefits, wellness programs, college savings plans, and other common voluntary payroll deductions.
Note: Employers need written authorization from the employee for the following deductions:
Voluntary and mandatory payroll deductions can be further classified as pre and post-tax deductions.
Pre-tax deductions are subtracted from an employee's gross paycheck before any state or federal taxes are withheld, lowering the taxable income. Common examples include health insurance, commuter benefits, group term life insurance, health savings accounts (HSA), flexible spending accounts (FSA), and retirement benefits plans. While participation is optional, it is generally beneficial for employees. Note that there's an annual limit set by the IRS on how much can be contributed to these pre-tax plans, such as 401(k).
Conversely, post-tax payroll deductions are adjusted from an employee's paycheck after taxes have been withheld. Examples include Roth IRA retirement contributions, charitable donations, disability insurance, and garnishments. These deductions don't reduce an employee's tax burden. Employees can choose not to contribute to these plans, except for wage garnishments.
Employers typically rely on benefits partners to inform them about various deduction details. These deductions are then processed through a payroll provider to determine an employee's net take-home pay. Payroll providers also ensure that necessary payments are made to the appropriate government entities on time.
The payroll deduction process follows a standard sequence:
As you can see, to successfully manage payroll deductions, there’s a lot of information exchange required between the employer, payroll provider, and benefits plan partners. Manual processes can render this experience even more redundant and error-prone. Tools like Finch help automate payroll deductions to ensure a seamless experience end-to-end. Learn more.
With so many deduction types, mistakes can happen. Common errors include:
Automating payroll deductions is highly beneficial as it captures changes and updates employee information, employment status, and contribution details promptly between systems, reducing errors in deduction calculations. Learn how Finch's automated deductions can reduce deduction errors altogether.
If payroll is calculated with incorrect deduction details it can result in employees being enrolled into the wrong tax brackets. This can result in higher taxes, penalties, or lost interest for employees.
If withholding calculations are not compliant with state and federal laws, employers need to compensate for back payments, not the employees.
Core benefits are the primary benefits employees receive for being employed by an organization. This includes retirement benefits, health insurance, etc. Fringe benefits are the extra perks that some employees get like free meals, childcare (up to $5,000), gym memberships, mental health benefits, group term life insurance, employee discounts, etc.
While most core benefits are mandated by federal and tax laws, employers offer fringe benefits to retain talent and infuse a positive work culture. The fringe benefits that are translated into cash form are usually deducted from employee wages.
Finch is committed to making payroll deductions easy and automated for employers. It aims to do this by helping innovative SaaS tools in the retirement, benefits, and insurance sectors build solutions that can be integrated with 200+ HR and payroll systems using a single unified employment API. By allowing benefits providers to fetch data from the employer’s source of truth, Finch ensures data accuracy and timely contribution updates to payroll.
Streamline deductions management: Finch eliminates the need for flat files, SFTP, or manual data entry to fetch employee census data and contribution details. It automates the entire process of payroll deductions by connecting the employer’s payroll systems with the benefit providers' tool.
Enhance accuracy through automation: Today, every employer is looking for automated deductions management. It frees up employer admin time as they don’t have to manually enter data into the provider’s system each time employment status changes.
Similarly, all contribution details can be written back into the payroll system without manual intervention. Automated adjustments increase data accuracy and help employers avoid the common payroll deduction mistakes we discussed earlier.
If you are a SaaS tool looking to automate payroll deductions, reach out to us, we’d be happy to help.
The wait is finally over. Download the 2023 State of Employment Tech Report for free below.
In June 2023, Finch surveyed 1,004 HR pros from a variety of industries and company sizes. Our aim was to uncover emerging trends while exploring the relationships between HR pros, their tech stacks, and the employment data they manage.
Inside, you’ll find powerful insights into the state of employment technology:
Download the report to discover how HR pros are navigating a tumultuous year, and what they want from the businesses that serve them.
The payroll ecosystem in the US is fragmented, with over 5,700 providers serving the country alone. Meanwhile, the employment ecosystem has never been more competitive, with best-of-breed applications catering to employers of all types. While both employers and employees stand to benefit from this trend, it also raises the bar for applications in the space to uplevel their customer experience, or risk losing customers. Connectivity to other apps in the ecosystem, especially critical systems such as payroll systems, is a big piece of this customer experience.
We’re thrilled to share our latest whitepaper, The Emergence of the Unified Employment API, which documents the evolution of popular data sync options, from manual entry to flat file transfers to direct integrations to unified APIs to specialized unified APIs such as the unified employment API.
Inside, you’ll learn:
Download the whitepaper learn more about the emergence of the unified employment API today!
CB Insights today named Finch to its sixth-annual Fintech 100 ranking (previously the Fintech 250) - showcasing the 100 most promising private fintech companies of 2023.
“Representing 24 different countries across the globe, this year’s Fintech 100 is shaping the future of real-time payments, spend management automation, embedded finance, and more,” said Chris Bendtsen, Lead Fintech Analyst, CB Insights. Together, they are not only increasing the pace of innovation, but launching new products and features to revolutionize the industry as a whole. I cannot wait to see what this cohort accomplishes next.”
“We are pleased to be featured in this list alongside other Finch customers. This ranking is further validation of Finch’s vision to make all applications in the employment ecosystem connected, so employers have the data and insights they need without unsecure and manual data transfers,” said Jeremy Zhang, CEO of Finch.
Utilizing the CB Insights platform, the research team selected these 100 winners from a pool of over 19,000 private companies, including applicants and nominees. They were chosen based on factors including - including equity funding, investor profiles, business relationships, R&D activity, news sentiment analysis, competitive landscape, proprietary Mosaic scores, and Yardstiq transcripts - and criteria such as tech novelty and market potential. The research team also reviewed thousands of Analyst Briefings submitted by applicants.
Finch is the #1 unified API for employment systems, with industry-leading coverage across 200+ payroll and HRIS providers. Our technology underpins the employment ecosystem, helping employers share organization, pay, and benefits data securely. Finch powers integrations for hundreds of platforms including Brex, Carta, and Betterment.
Quick facts on the 2023 Fintech 100:
About CB Insights
CB Insights builds software that enables the world's best companies to discover, understand, and make technology decisions with confidence. By marrying data, expert insights, and work management tools, clients manage their end-to-end technology decision-making process on CB Insights. To learn more, please visit www.cbinsights.com.
Contact:
chris.orlando@cbinsights.com
Sign up here to be the first to receive the full report once it's published in October 2023:
Recently, Finch commissioned a survey exploring the relationship human resources (HR) professionals have with their tech stacks, specifically the employment systems they use to manage employee data. To get a clear picture of the industry, the survey polled 1,004 HR professionals throughout the United States. The full report will be published in October but, in the meantime, here’s a sneak peek into some of the findings.
Note: Our team defines employment systems as tools that store data centered around the employee lifecycle. Examples of employment systems include but are not limited to Human Resource Information Systems (HRIS), payroll, benefits, business finance, tax, compliance, and insurance applications.
In the survey, we found that 49% of HR professionals say they leverage seven or more employment systems of record, inclusive of their HRIS, ATS, benefits administration, payroll, and time-tracking systems. This becomes more complex with larger organizations: 38% of HR professionals whose organizations have more than 1,000 employees report having ten or more employment systems in their tech stack.
While nearly all respondents (97%) say it's important for their employment systems of record to integrate with other tools in their tech stacks, 84% say this connectivity is very or extremely important. Yet, 55% of HR professionals say that between one and six of their tools automatically sync employment data from their systems of record.
With so many disparate and siloed tools to manage, there’s a strong need for greater connectivity throughout the employment ecosystem. For HR professionals, better system integrations will be the key to boosting efficiency, enabling them to do their jobs more effectively and with more ease.
Our survey found that 58% of HR professionals spend more than seven hours in employment systems each week. 68% say they regularly or constantly switch between different employment systems throughout the day. 51% of those who toggle between different employment systems admit doing so leaves them feeling overwhelmed, stressed, annoyed, frustrated, or angry.
Interestingly, HR executives spend more time in their employment systems than their workers. Whereas 72% of VP- and C-level leaders say they spend seven or more hours logged in, just 46% of individual contributors say the same. Surprisingly, executives also report spending more time manually entering employment data and toggling between different systems than the individual contributors who work for them.
Not as surprising, 64% of HR professionals say they spend between four to nine hours manually entering data per week. This is somewhat expected and unfortunately accepted in the HR industry given the highly-sensitive nature of information that needs to be inserted into these employment systems. However, these manual processes clearly aren’t meeting the mark when it comes to accuracy: 56% of HR professionals say their team finds incorrect or outdated information in employee data at least once a week.
This data tells us that there’s a huge opportunity to improve the many employment systems that HR professionals have to manually enter data into.
On the topic of entering data into employment systems, we decided to see how securely HR professionals gather and manage sensitive employment data. We found that the top two channels HR professionals currently use to communicate sensitive employment data are email (65%) and video conferencing tools, such as Zoom or Google Meet (51%).
Shockingly, 41% of HR professionals admit they communicate sensitive employment data via text message or SMS. Findings further reveal the biggest offenders are those who should know better: 50% of HR professionals with Chief Human Resource Officer, VP of HR or Head of HR titles admit to communicating sensitive employment data through text message or SMS.
While most respondents (68%) admit they’re worried about employment data breaches, a greater percentage (76%) is concerned about complying with data security regulations, with 57% of HR professionals saying they are very or extremely concerned. 70% of those in executive roles such as CHRO, VP or Head of HR say they’re very or extremely concerned about complying with employment data security regulations. In comparison, fewer of those in individual contributor HR roles (39%) express the same high levels of concern about complying with employment data security regulations.
The takeaway is clear: HR professionals need to find a more secure way to share employment data.
With nearly three in five HR professionals already utilizing generative AI technologies, there is a decidedly large awareness of AI’s potential within the human resources field. Yet, notably, there’s a significant disconnect between HR executives and individual contributors when it comes to whether AI technology is actually being used on a regular basis: The vast majority (84%) of HR executives at the VP level or higher (e.g., Head of HR, CHRO, etc.) believe their teams are using generative AI, yet only 34% of individual contributors report doing so.
Meanwhile, views around the impact and implications of AI tools continue to be mixed. While a majority of HR professionals rate artificial intelligence as being both relatively powerful and a competitive advantage, many still perceive AI as being relatively expensive, exclusive, and risky to use. There is also a great deal of fear about the potential of the human resources occupation being outsourced to AI, as indicated in numerous open-ended responses. Yet, where AI takes the HR field going forward remains to be seen.
Finch will be announcing the full results of this survey in October, which will include in-depth breakouts of the above data. Interested in seeing the full report once it’s published? Sign up below to be notified.
This survey was conducted online within the United States from June 21 - 30, 2023 among 1,004 human resources professionals, all of whom were employed full-time.
The vast majority (78%) were team leaders in director, vice president, or c-level executive roles. The other 22% were individual contributors, many of whom specialized in a specific domain within human resources, such as people operations, talent acquisition, or DEI.
Surprisingly, 63% of respondents were neither remote nor hybrid workers, instead being required to come into the office five days per week.
Hundreds of employees were just denied life insurance benefits. Finch could have prevented it from happening.
In May 2023, the Wall Street Journal reported that hundreds of families who had diligently paid life insurance premiums were denied millions of dollars in death benefits. This unfortunate outcome stemmed from paperwork missteps made by both employers and insurance companies.
However, this situation could have been avoided with the assistance of Finch’s unified API, which bridges data silos to connect mission-critical employment data. In this blog post, we’ll delve into what happened and how Finch can help prevent such issues from happening again.
The report revealed that a leading life insurer had made errors resulting in over 200 denied claims, amounting to as much as $7 million, in recent years. The denial of these claims left families in a distressing situation, as they were rightfully expecting financial support during a difficult time.
Despite diligently paying life insurance premiums, employees were denied their life insurance benefits due to "paperwork errors" made by their employers. These errors specifically involved the failure to submit "evidence of good health" questionnaires, which are often required for employees to qualify for supplemental insurance beyond the basic coverage. As a result, the life insurance company did not approve the employees for supplemental life insurance, and their claims were denied.
For background, group life insurance is a common employee benefit, with coverage typically ranging from 1-2 times an employee's salary. Employers often offer supplemental insurance beyond the basic coverage, and employees contribute to it through their paychecks. However, to be eligible for this additional coverage, employees must fulfill certain criteria.
According to the carrier, the responsibility lies with employers, who must submit the required “Evidence of Good Health” form.
Employers often handle administrative tasks, including the calculation of premiums and ensuring that employees complete the necessary health forms for additional coverage. This allows insurers to offer life insurance to workers at relatively low costs and has been the standard practice for years according to the American Council of Life Insurers.
But doesn’t the carrier also bear some responsibility too? While it may seem logical that the carrier should be accountable for the payouts since they accepted the premiums, the truth is carriers are often encumbered by siloed systems and flawed processes—which lead to clunky and error-prone data exchanges with employers. For example, premiums are often aggregated rather than individually specified in employer-administered programs, making it difficult to link specific premiums to individuals. Furthermore, some carriers only conduct audits when a death claim is filed, rather than beforehand.
The courts say both parties have a role to play in preventing these issues going forward. Carriers must improve communication with employers regarding their responsibilities, and employers must submit the appropriate paperwork on behalf of their employees. In this case, the carrier has agreed to notify its employer clients that they must confirm the approval of health forms for workers' supplemental coverage before deducting premiums from paychecks. At the same time, if employers fail to fulfill their obligations, they may be held liable for payouts to the beneficiaries.
At the end of the day, it’s about miscommunication between the carrier and employers, and inadequate sharing of data between them. And this problem isn’t unique to this case. Insurance carriers everywhere struggle with similar issues when it comes to collecting and managing data on individuals through their employer. In many instances, even leading insurers don’t have access to the technology they need to effectively tackle these challenges.
The responsibility for preventing such issues is increasingly falling on employers and their employees. Employers must be more diligent in filing paperwork, ensuring eligibility criteria are met, and obtaining approval for coverage before collecting premiums from employees and forwarding them to insurance carriers.
Despite the advanced technology we have access to in 2023, the administration of employee benefits still poses challenges. Sharing employee data between systems is still in its infancy and although thousands of apps have been created over the past decade to help employers manage employee data—no underlying infrastructure exists to connect all this data together. In fact, with over 5,700 employment systems in existence today, the market remains highly fragmented, making it nearly impossible for a third-party solution to solve the problem comprehensively.
Consequently, employers are forced to manually enter and transfer employee data between multiple systems. This manual process is time-consuming and prone to error. And to make matters more complicated, each system has its own rules and standards regarding data formats, leading to inconsistencies and compatibility issues when transferring information. As a result, crucial details often fall through the cracks, causing problems such as the denial of life insurance benefits.
Employers need to demand that their HR systems communicate with each other, eliminating the need for manual data entry and ensuring a streamlined process. It's time for the industry to embrace interoperability and leverage its buying power to make automated employee benefit administration a reality.
Finch provides the vital infrastructure to connect disparate systems, facilitating secure and efficient movement of sensitive employment data between them. By integrating with Finch, third party organizations like insurance carriers gain direct access to relevant employee data from an employer's systems of record, such as HRIS and payroll software. This connectivity is extremely powerful for companies with the fiduciary duty to report on individual employee evidence of insurability—streamlining the exchange of information, and making it easier for carriers and employers to exchange employee data accurately.
For example, after integrating with Finch, carriers can prompt employers to connect their employment systems of record, granting permission for the carrier to access relevant employee data. The carrier can then automatically pull the required information, evaluate eligibility and approve coverage. Employers can proceed to collect and pay premiums, ensuring employees receive the coverage they are entitled to.
However, it’s important to note that no two implementations ever look the same. That’s why, at Finch, we’re here to help advise.
Simple administrative errors shouldn’t be the reason life insurance benefits are denied. And with employment data that’s connected and programmable, they don’t have to be. In fact, everybody wins with effective data sharing. Carriers and employers can both ensure they’ve done their part, reducing their risk of future litigation, and employees get their rightful benefits, at a time when they need them most.
To learn more about how Finch can help prevent life insurance benefit denials, reach out to our sales team.
In a recent webinar, Ansel Parikh, Co-Founder and COO of Finch, demonstrated how a unified employment data API can unlock multiple advantages for insurance providers, including pay-as-you-go premium models, and increase overall operational efficiency.
According to a recent study by Corinium, 65% of insurance executives aren’t fully confident in the data that’s being used for quoting and claims validation. When insurance providers don’t have timely access to accurate data—especially employment data—millions of dollars are left on the table. The problem is, traditional processes to access employment data involve manual, time-consuming tasks and a heavy amount of resources.
That’s where Finch comes in.
On April 4, 2023, Ansel Parikh, co-founder and COO of Finch, led the webinar Insuring a Future: Keep Your Insurance Product Cutting Edge in 2023 to demonstrate how insurance providers can improve operational efficiency, benefits coverage, premium collections, and customer experience through the use of a unified employment data API.
He covered the following topics:
Below, we provide highlights from the webinar. You can also watch the complete recording by filling out the form below.
Employment data is the entire scope of information that sits in different systems of record across the entire employee lifecycle.
Employment data includes:
Finch focuses on the employment data that's housed in HR and payroll systems. And this information—particularly the granular information in payroll records around individual pay statements, specific deductions, past wages, and tips—has the power to streamline the process of insurance workflows and open up new customer segments for different types of insurance lines.
There are three prevalent ways insurance providers can use employment data to innovate their processes:
We go further into the details for each use case below.
The insurance industry is always looking to improve the quoting process for different lines of insurance such as worker’s compensation, commercial, group life, and group health.
Typically, quoting for these lines includes asking prospects to complete 10+ manual forms that require them to log into different systems or pull detailed information like an EIN to find gross wages per employee for the last month. In total, prospects have to input over 25 lines of data—including location details, company information, and employee salaries—just to generate a quote.
This manual labor slows down the quoting process and prohibits the likelihood of conversion.
“We've talked to many insurance providers who see a considerable drop off…when people have to continually fill out form after form after form. At Finch, our goal is to turn it into a 30-second process, where that prospect syncs their employment data instead, specifically the information needed for quoting, [by pulling] it straight from the source of truth,” said Ansel.
Access to this data allows insurance providers to pre-fill many form fields, so they can deliver quotes faster using real-time data from the prospect’s payroll system. Because employment data from payroll systems goes to the IRS every three months, the information has already been validated, helping to produce more accurate quotes in addition to streamlining their delivery.
Similar to the quoting process, data collection for submitting a claim is onerous for the policyholder. Claims forms require dozens of different lines of data that need to be self-reported by the employer and the employee, which then have to be individually verified by insurance providers’ claims processing teams. All of that time adds up.
Alternatively, insurance providers can pull this information directly from payroll systems via API, including fields like date of employment to confirm that a claim is being made by a current employee. Having programmatic access to this data helps insurance providers verify claims eligibility quickly, seamlessly, and accurately by pre-filing forms to save time and reduce self-reporting errors.
In other words, when employment data comes directly from the HR or payroll system—the source of truth—it helps insurance providers determine if the claim is valid right from the start. The insurance provider knows exactly who the person making a claim is, that the date of the claim aligns with their actual employment dates, and if they’re even eligible to file a claim, all within minutes.
When it comes to workers compensation, insurance providers often leave premiums on the table—especially for highly seasonal businesses—by waiting until the end of a policy to reconcile payments. This also creates surprise bills for customers and reduces customer satisfaction.
Alternatively, when insurance providers check to ensure the right premiums are being charged throughout the course of the policy, as opposed to the year-end audit period, they have the ability to change their customers’ payment structures when appropriate.
For example, if a ski resort’s policy starts in the summer, underwriting is based on the number of employees they have during that time. It takes a full-year cycle and a premium audit to notice the number of employees increased three-fold during the winter months. As a result, risk is mispriced, the ski resort doesn’t pay an accurate premium for their policy, and they receive an unexpected bill after the audit to shore up costs.
When insurance providers have the ability to unlock a pay-as-you-go model, real-time employment data creates more accurate premiums and more efficient cash collection throughout the policy’s term without mispricing risks for a large chunk of the year. Premiums can be adjusted as the risk profile evolves, the policyholder doesn’t receive surprise bills, and customer satisfaction increases. This becomes especially important during the renewal cycle, when insurance providers are looking to retain customers.
A pay-as-you-go program that utilizes automated employment data feeds provides a more efficient, cost-effective, and accurate solution for insurance providers, agents, and policyholders.
“When [employment] data is accessible, and the process is streamlined, it reduces friction for the policyholders’ renewal. The data also is processed in a much more standardized, ingestible format. But what’s most exciting about this pay-as-you-go model is that policyholders love it. It allows them to have more working capital, and that’s incredibly valuable,” said Ansel.
However, as valuable as employment data can be across the policy lifecycle, it’s a major problem to access this information even today.
The main challenge of accessing employment data is market fragmentation. There are over 5,700 HR and payroll systems being used by U.S. businesses today, and the top 10 payroll systems only account for about 55% of the market.
So, even if an insurance provider integrates with all 10 of these systems, the employment data of almost half of businesses in the U.S. would remain inaccessible. Ensuring proper coverage of an insurance provider’s target market means integrating with hundreds of HR and payroll systems. That’s no small feat.
There are three different ways insurance providers try to gather information from HR and payroll systems:
The problem is, individual builds take up a lot of engineering resources, costing hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars over the life of the integration.
“We've seen teams spend over a year just to build one integration, but then you still have to maintain that integration for the future. That’s a consistent resource drain,” said Ansel.
Other times, insurance providers will get customers’ IT teams involved to set up an SFTP. This means that the systems involved need to exchange flash files, which usually leads to a configuration problem, because every system has a different format.
“You're introducing a ton of friction for every single customer in order for them to share the key information you need to streamline these workflows,” said Ansel.
Asking customers to manually upload employment data from their HR and payroll systems isn’t just labor intensive. Manual uploads introduce more risk because there’s a chance that the data isn’t up to date. It also increases the chances of people misreporting data, not out of malice, but because the process itself lends itself to human error.
None of these options create seamless experiences for insurance providers or their customers, who expect systems to be able to talk to one another.
APIs allow secure data transfers between two or more systems to happen in real time, and different kinds of APIs exist to serve different datasets. An employment data API provides secure access to sources of employment data: HRIS and payroll systems. And they do it with a single integration, so it’s as easy for customers to transfer data as it is for them to sign into their payroll accounts.
Utilizing an employment data API like Finch for integrations leads to substantial material benefits that can boost return on equity (ROE).
Integrating with Finch’s standardized API schema unlocks programmatic access to hundreds of HR and payroll systems. Compared to building one-off integrations in-house, the time and cost savings are tremendous.
One Finch client, for example, now has direct employment data connections with more than 3,000 of their customers, and they were able to reduce their development costs by 75% by aggregating that access through Finch instead of building those integrations one by one.
Without an API, accurately syncing data between systems via SFTP or manual uploads often requires an investment of at least 1.5 hours in support calls and dedicated support team resources to walk customers through the specific syncing instructions for different payroll providers. These approaches don't scale well, and they divert insurance providers’ resources away from core objectives like driving ROE and renewal rates.
In contrast, setting up API-enabled employment data feeds is quick and easy, reducing the number of support inquiries that policyholders make and requiring less support resources.
By allowing insurance providers to offer more customers seamless quoting, onboarding, and claims experiences, universal employment data APIs like Finch increase insurance providers’ potential to unlock new customer segments.
“There's a halo effect of saying, ‘I'm compatible with your payroll system,’ because customers trust that payroll system for very core pieces of information and operations. Your association and compatibility with that system extends that credibility to your product. Potential customers are more likely to trust your product because it talks to systems they already trust,” said Ansel.
Unlike manual data entry, which is prone to human error, automated employment data feeds via API allow for improved data accuracy and visibility, both of which are crucial to the calculation of workers’ compensation premiums and claims payments. In turn, insurance providers can better manage risk and make more informed decisions.
InsurePay is a technology company that offers a cloud-based payment platform for workers' compensation insurance premiums. Their platform integrates with insurance providers, payroll providers, and brokers to automate and simplify the premium calculation and payment process.
Finch’s API ensures data is flowing compliantly and securely from the policyholder's payroll system of record to InsurePay as well as the insurance provider.
“We enjoy partnering with InsurePay, because they understand all the different pieces of the policy lifecycle and where improvements can come from. InsurePay wanted to partner with Finch, because we understand the value of automating payroll connectivity and unlocking a pay-as-you-go model,” said Ansel.
Our goal at Finch is to simplify access to HR and payroll systems with one simple, streamlined integration.
With Finch, insurance providers can map to one unified data structure, capture more edge cases, and expand their integration network anytime we add a new system. We’re singularly positioned to provide insurance providers with mission-critical infrastructure for employment data across a wide range of verticals, including read-and-write compatibility with 200+ HR and payroll systems used by more than 88% of U.S. businesses.
To learn how Finch can serve your insurance product, reach out to our team or have your developers sign up for a free account to begin building Finch today.
To learn more, visit tryfinch.com.
Health and wellness benefits in the United States are at an inflection point. And if you’re a health and wellness benefits provider, that puts you in a favorable position.
The reason? Converging factors have prompted many employers to reconsider their approach to benefits–not only to entice great employees but to help existing employees stay healthy and productive. Among them:
Meanwhile, employers also continue to face old problems like outdated benefits management systems, costly and time-consuming manual processes, and health benefit underutilization.
To gain traction and earn market share, emerging and established health benefits providers can use integrations with payroll and HR systems to create best-in-class health and wellness benefit experiences that help employers meet their complex needs and mitigate some of their most pressing issues.
A review of employers’ attitudes around benefits technology suggests that the time is ripe for integrations.
Studies show that employers are demonstrating an increased willingness to pay for digital initiatives. According to a recent survey, spending on HR and benefits technology grew 15% between 2017 and 2021, with 70% of employers reporting a renewed focus on benefits technology following the pandemic.
Reports also suggest employers are intrigued by the power of data and how it can help them optimize their HR functions. In fact, 76% indicated they would consider sharing basic employee information with insurance providers in order to create more personalized, tailored health benefits experiences for their workers.
With employers receptive to data’s potential and poised to pursue new benefit technologies, health benefits providers would be smart to use integrations to help address some of employers’ most pressing wants and needs.
Here are just some of the ways that integrations can serve your customers:
Historically, processes like benefits enrollment and payroll deduction changes have been time- and labor-intensive for both employers and employees. With integrations, enrolling an employee in any benefit takes just a few clicks–no manual paperwork required!
Integrations also allow you to push information to payroll and HR systems, making tasks like payroll deduction changes practically friction-free. In short, manual tasks that once took days or weeks and a lot of effort can now happen in minutes.
Ask almost any employer and they will say achieving high utilization rates for key health benefits like health insurance, HSAs, FSAs, and employee assistance programs (EAPs) is a struggle. Studies suggesting that one in three workers would rather talk about their weight than their employee benefits and others that show average EAP utilization does not exceed 10% support their anecdotal claims. Workers not taking advantage of the benefits they’re entitled to might put them at increased risk for worse health outcomes and financial hardship. For employers, underutilization can mean higher premiums and tax bills.
Part of the problem seems to be that many legacy benefits systems were not designed with user experience in mind. If a system is difficult for HR teams and workers to navigate or unpleasant to engage with, utilization will suffer. Benefits education is another issue, with 68% of employers calling it “a challenge,” and 37% believing that employees don’t understand the value of benefits well enough to justify the cost.
Innovative benefits providers know that integrations are a key component of good product design. By making it simple and seamless to onboard new employers and manage workers’ benefits (i.e., no more CSV files), integrations contribute to an all-around better user experience, which can help employers realize improved utilization rates, healthier and happier employees, and cost savings.
Take HSAs as an example. Because integrations make it easy for HR teams to enroll an employee in an HSA and manage their HSA payroll deductions, more employees are likely to take advantage. In turn, employers can realize lower HDHP premiums and lower FICA taxes.
From their social media feeds, to their Netflix recommendations, to their subscription cosmetic boxes, Millennial and Gen Z consumers are accustomed to being catered to with highly personalized experiences, and they’re bringing those expectations with them to the labor force. In response, employers are looking for ways to offer more tailored health benefit experiences to their employees, and they are willing to trade data to get there.
Integrations allow that exchange of data to happen securely, seamlessly, continuously, and in real time, so innovative health benefits providers can build the next generation of custom benefits experiences. As a bonus, integrations can also provide benefits providers with granular visibility into how benefits are being used (or not) across customers and systems, making possible data-substantiated strategies for improving engagement and utilization.
Offering attractive benefits is a research-backed strategy for finding and retaining talent. At a time when there are nearly 11 million U.S. job vacancies and workers are quitting jobs in droves, employers are starting to evaluate the benefits they offer and look for ways to improve. In today’s climate, that means offering things like mental health assistance and telemedicine services but also focusing on the quality of core health benefits like insurance, HSAs, and FSAs.
This is especially critical in a country like the United States, where employer-sponsored health insurance is not a given. In fact, among businesses with 10 to 24 employees, only 52% offer health insurance. In the case of businesses with fewer than 10 employees, that number drops to 23%.
By automating countless health benefits tasks and processes, integrations free up time and help employers reduce administrative costs, making it possible for employers to offer more and better benefits to their workers. This is especially true for small businesses, who generally don’t have the bandwidth to manage traditional HR packages in house. Consequently, if a benefits provider makes it easy (with the help of integrations), offering health insurance can suddenly become feasible. And with 46% of workers saying health insurance strongly influenced their decision to accept a job, the ROI to employers is practically assured.
Integrations can also aid in worker retention. In fact, 56% of workers reported that the quality of their employer-sponsored health coverage is a key factor in their decision to stay at their job.
However, there might be something else at play as well. By automating tasks that were once the purview of internal benefits administrators, HR teams have more time to allocate to the human side of human resources–that is, helping individual employees not only understand and engage with their benefits but also develop professionally and grow in their careers. In turn, employees are more likely to feel seen and valued, and that can be reason enough for anyone to stay put.
In summary, integrations are essential to building industry-leading benefits products and services for your customers and their employees. But being responsible for your own integrations is a mammoth undertaking. The payroll and HR management systems industry is so fragmented (5,700+ providers - read our whitepaper here) that you would need to build and maintain dozens (if not hundreds) of integrations just to cover your total addressable market–not to mention, figure out how to properly scrub and standardize the data input and properly format it for consumption. Talk about a distraction from your core competencies.
The better solution is Finch, which provides integrations to major and boutique HR-management and payroll systems like QuickBooks, ADP Run, Workday, and Paylocity via one universal API. Finch unifies access to and smoothes over the differences among these systems to support many innovative use cases. And as we add new systems to our coverage network (which is always), you can turn them on in one click.
On the front end, Finch presents as a friendly, intuitive module that lets employers grant your application secure, instant, and regulation-compliant access to their payroll and HR systems. The process takes less than 30 seconds:
The connection allows your application to read information like census data, which streamlines onboarding and enrollment, as well as write information like contribution and deduction adjustments, which streamlines benefits management.
Basically, Finch makes innovation possible for health benefits providers that want to disrupt an industry that clearly stands ready for change.
Learn how Finch is making it possible for Lane Health to offer first-of-their-kind, tax-advantaged loans to workers with HSAs–saving both Lane Health and its customers time and money in the process.
Click the black Request Access button in the upper-right of this webpage to submit a question or ask to see our API documentation.
By not dividing your team’s attention between your core product and the ancillary technologies that support it, you can build smarter, get to market faster, and create an exceptional experience for your customers.
As an innovative retirement benefits provider, you already know that the retirement benefits industry has room for improvement. Legacy business models and outdated management systems are prevalent and prohibitive–serving as barriers, in many cases, to employer and employee adoption.
Consider the numbers. Some 68% of private-sector workers have access to retirement benefits through their employer, and, of them, 51% elect to participate. At first blush, the data doesn’t seem half bad. However, it belies the fact that more than 38 million workers aren’t being offered retirement benefits at all, and 40 million more aren’t opting in for one reason or another. Meanwhile, among those who do participate in a retirement plan, more than half are behind on their retirement strategies, either because they aren’t contributing enough or they’re raiding their plans in times of emergency.
This statistic also obscures the reality that access to retirement benefits is far from inclusive. In service industries, for example, workers with employer-sponsored plans drops to 40%, and in some verticals, like restaurants, it’s as low as 18%.
Clearly, something’s not working as it should. When you couple that with employers’ struggle to attract and retain employees and the challenges of remote and hybrid work models, the need for viable HR technology solutions in the retirement benefits space is apparent.
While there’s no one solution that will address every issue, focusing your efforts on building a best-in-class platform for your customers is a great place to start. The reason? HR professionals are overwhelmed by the tedious transactional tasks associated with retirement benefits management and consider it one of their most pressing challenges. That makes retirement benefits ripe for digital disruption. In fact, HR leaders are more likely to realize benefits from HR technology when it’s applied to benefits administration than any other HR function.
Staying ahead of the pack is another reason. Whether you choose to optimize your retirement benefits platform or not, your competitors certainly will. The HR tech market is booming, and that means next-generation benefits solutions–with best-in-class platforms–are regularly hitting the market.
At its core, a best-in-class retirement benefits platform is a connected one, meaning it can exchange information with employers’ HR and payroll systems (e.g., Paychex, ADP RUN, Gusto), for a highly synced, coordinated, and automated benefits management experience.
From onboarding and enrollment to deduction management and compliance reporting, a well-connected platform–one with sophisticated software integrations–minimizes friction at every step of the benefits lifecycle, alleviating your customers of their benefits management burdens and making engagement with your platform an enjoyable and reliable experience. In turn, you realize higher employee participation and contributions.
Chances are, this is not new information to you. You’re probably building or already have built integrations with market-leading HR and payroll systems. At the same time, you’ve probably experienced one or more of these common headaches along the way:
So, how do you leverage the very best of system integrations and all the benefits they offer your customers while avoiding the pitfalls that come with in-house build outs and maintenance? The answer is outsourcing.
In a fragmented industry with 5,700+ employment systems, outsourcing your integrations saves time and money. Instead of building integrations with dozens of payroll systems yourself, an integration partner does the work for you, while also providing ongoing support and maintenance. This outsourced infrastructure lets your team focus on fine-tuning your product, executing your roadmap, and creating the best user experience possible.
That said, the right integration partner won’t just relieve you of headaches; they will add extraordinary value to your platform. For that, you need a use case specialist.
Say hello to Finch, the only integration platform solely focused on connecting applications to their employer clients’ payroll and HR systems. This means all of our efforts are spent optimizing and scaling integrations to cover all the edge cases relevant to your business.
Finch offers a unified API with 360° integrations into an ever-growing list of HR and payroll systems (125 at the time of publication). In this context, 360° means read and write access, so you can pull census and pay statement information as well as push payroll deductions depending on employee contributions. Since Finch abstracts away inconsistencies across systems, all these actions can be accessed through a single set of endpoints.
Aside from streamlining technical workflows, Finch offers high-touch support, ensuring any issues are dealt with swiftly and, most importantly, without intervention from your team.
Perhaps the most immediate benefit of Finch is the hyper-streamlined onboarding it enables. With Finch, it only takes a moment for customers to authorize you to retrieve and send data from and to their payroll and HR systems. Here’s how:
That’s all it takes. In seconds, you have what you need to begin enrolling employees in retirement plans and managing their payroll deductions.
Once you’re connected, you can access live census data to streamline onboarding and offboarding of eligible employees. From day one (or the first day they can participate), you’ll have their key contact information, location, and worker status to ensure they can start contributing to their retirement as soon as possible. Similarly, when someone is no longer employed or eligible, you can offboard them from the system automatically and transition their account to a non-employee access so they can still manage the plans they do have.
For retirement benefits applications that also act as recordkeepers, you can access current and historical pay statement details down to the line item to ensure proper tracking of all contributions (pre and post-tax), enrollments, and TINs required to comply with IRS regulations.
Now that employees are onboarded, you’ll want to make sure they start contributing to their retirement goals with their first paycheck. You’ll need to create benefits, enroll participants, and make changes directly in payroll as their retirement savings plans shift.
Using Finch’s Benefits endpoint, you can create benefits (pre-tax, post-tax, recurring, one-time deductions), enroll individuals to one or many benefits, and select their $ or % contributions with employer matches where applicable. Throughout this whole process, the sponsor’s HR admin doesn’t have to lift a finger to upload deduction files or manually enter changes. That can amount to hours per month saved and dozens of potential human errors avoided.
Best of all, Finch is dynamic, responsive, and built to scale.
For new edge case systems that come up in customer conversations, Finch can unlock support in as little as two weeks. That means, on the off chance you’re trying to land a customer that uses a system not yet covered by Finch, we have a gameplan to expand coverage so you don’t lose a sale.
Finch is also designed for large-scale synchronization with tens of thousands of employers, from small startups to massive public companies. Our team has accumulated expertise in constructing mission-critical infrastructure over many years, enabling us to surface large quantities of sensitive information reliably and securely.
Click the black Request Access button in the upper-right of this webpage to submit a question or ask to see our API documentation.
The employment landscape is undergoing dramatic changes, and data integrations are crucial to keeping pace. But maintaining them in-house is a drain on your resources and a distraction from your core competencies. Here’s what to do instead.
Not so long ago, it seemed like all it took to earn a reputation for a great work environment was a few ping pong tables, some quirky seating arrangements, and a gourmet cafeteria. Then COVID-19 happened and the story changed dramatically.
Now, old standards have given way to new expectations about what it means to provide an exceptional workplace. For employee engagement platforms, it has been a clarion call, prompting innovative players to build next-generation platforms that solve the challenges employers face today and are predicted to face going forward.
One aspect of great platform design is integrations. They are foundational to best-in-class functionality and user experience, but not all approaches to integrations are created equal. In this blog post, we’ll cover how to approach integrations more efficiently and effectively, so you have greater bandwidth to focus on your platform’s core technologies and deliver a superior experience to your customers and their employees alike.
To understand how and why integrations are so important, we have to consider the current state of affairs. It likely goes without saying that COVID-19 and the concurrent social and political movements of the past few years have seismically changed aspects of our collective work life in ways that fundamentally impact how employers approach people management and employee engagement. Some of the most important include:
We would be remiss not to mention what you probably already know: workers are quitting and switching jobs at record rates, or leaving the workforce entirely, and there are now more available jobs than there is talent to fill them. Experts don’t expect the tide to change anytime soon. While many employers are responding to the pressures by offering higher salaries and wages to new hires, an effective, longer-term strategy may be investing in a “sticky” workplace culture—one marked by regular, effective communication—that promotes employee retention.
Office closure mandates at the onset of the pandemic forced many employers to allow employees to work from home, and it seems employees have come to favor the arrangement. According to recent polls, 45% of full-time U.S. employees continue to work remotely all or some of the time, including 67% of office workers. Of them, 91% would like to work at least some of the time from home even after the pandemic fully subsides, with 30% disclosing that they are extremely likely to seek a different job if they lose their option to work remotely.
Another factor to consider is that remote and hybrid work models can mean fewer friends in the workplace, which can lead to weaker emotional ties and less social pressure to stay with a company. Moreover, without any geographical constraints, remote workers have a wider pool of employers and job opportunities to choose from, making it easier to find alternative work. As a consequence, employers who don’t develop viable solutions to manage, engage, and build connections among remote talent not only risk operational inefficiencies, they also risk losing valuable employees.
As activists continue to bring renewed and revolutionary attention to issues of racial and gender justice, employers are being called on to look critically at their own diversity, equity, and inclusion practices and execute proactive, ongoing plans to remedy their gaps and shortcomings. Many, it seems, are heeding the call. A recent analysis of S&P 500 earnings calls found that CEOs have discussed DEI 658% more frequently since 2018, and 40% of organizations report having hired a DEI specialist, the majority of which were added to their rosters in the past year and a half. As a result, DEI initiatives will naturally extend to employee engagement strategies, including measures like surveying employees on DEI issues, tracking and analyzing measures of workplace diversity, and instituting inclusive career growth paths and coaching opportunities to ensure everyone has the same access to success.
The collective and individual trauma and stress employees have experienced in recent years has had a toll on their mental health, making it more clear than ever that employers can no longer afford, from an ethical or financial standpoint, to ignore the overall wellbeing of their workforce. As talking about and seeking help for mental health challenges becomes increasingly normalized, especially among younger generations of workers, employers are increasingly expected to not only provide resources and benefits to support employees in crisis but also cultivate an environment that supports employee mental health. According to one study, employers (and the employee engagement platforms that serve them) would be wise to focus on reducing job boredom and monotony, supporting employees’ work-life balance, improving workplace communication practices, and fostering connections and networks of support among colleagues and managers.
These trends and others have led thought leaders to call for a large-scale humanization of the workplace. Now more than ever, employers should create opportunities and leverage technology to drive connections, inspire creativity, and help individual workers achieve their potential.
Clearly, this new world order presents a litany of challenges for employers, and employee engagement platforms are working to deliver best-in-class solutions and experiences that address those pain points.
For many employee engagement platforms, this includes integrating with employers’ HR and payroll systems (e.g., Workday, ADP, etc.) to automate data connectivity and unify data across disparate sources as a means of reducing friction and optimizing the performance of their product.
But integrations are not without challenges, especially if you choose to build them in-house. For starters:
It takes many engineering hours to build one integration, let alone the dozens or hundreds required to connect with systems in highly fragmented markets like HR and payroll software, where some 5,700+ systems have shares (check out our whitepaper on the landscape here). When you consider the average salary of an in-house developer, you’re looking at an investment of hundreds of thousands of dollars, excluding the considerable and ongoing expense of maintaining integrations over time (a full-time job unto itself).
All that time spent on integrations is time your team isn’t spending on your core technology—a huge opportunity cost. How much more could you accomplish and how much faster could you get to market if your team’s attention wasn’t split between your product and the ancillary technologies that support it?
If integrations aren’t in your team’s wheelhouse, your integrations are likely not functioning as well as they could be. That’s because different data sources have different data models, and each source value has to be mapped to a target data field to make it operable for your system. The more source values you’re working with, the more complicated things get, and if mapping is not done correctly, it can end up requiring a lot of manual intervention to make right.
Then there’s the issue of data enrichment. It takes a specialist to add value to the data you retrieve and make it optimally usable and actionable for your particular use case. In other words, it’s likely that the data you’re accessing via in-house builds isn’t reaching its potential.
Outsourcing your platform’s integrations enables you to take advantage of all the benefits while avoiding these common challenges.
Innovative employee engagement platforms looking to build best-in-class experiences and get to market faster turn to Finch—the only integration partner focused on HR and payroll systems via the employer access point.
Finch works via a single, universal API that offers 360° integrations with an ever-growing network of HR and payroll systems (125 at the time of publication), so you can cover more of your addressable market than ever before.
By building your platform on the Finch API, your customers can authorize you to retrieve data from their payroll and HR systems in just a few clicks. Here’s how it works:
That’s it. With Finch, what was once a 30-day process of tedious CSV file uploads, phone calls, and back-and-forth between your support team and your customers is reduced to 30 seamless seconds.
From there, you have access to your customers’ entire employee roster and dozens of data attributes per worker (e.g., hire date, job title, work and home location), allowing your customers to start using your platform immediately.
Not only does that save you time and improve your lead conversion rates, it’s a selling point to customers, who can be easily deterred by a drawn-out onboarding process.
And because the data connection is continuous, your platform is automatically apprised of new hires and other changes in end-user work status. In turn, your platform also makes onboarding and offboarding your customers’ employees easier, faster, and more automated. That can pay dividends for your customers, as studies show that strong onboarding processes improve employee retention by 82 percent.
The advantages of using Finch don’t stop there:
Last but not least, we handle all upkeep and maintenance of your integrations, so your team can focus on what you do best—helping employers cultivate engaging, connected, and productive workplaces, no matter what the world throws their way.
Click the black Request Access button in the upper-right of this webpage to submit a question or ask to see our API documentation.
The Finch advisor and former HCM (Human Capital Management) exec shares his wishes and predictions for the industry he helped shape over the last two decades.
Two years ago, Craig Cohen left his position as general manager at ADP Marketplace for the world of e-commerce. Despite the leap, he’s still very much invested in HCM, both as a financial backer and an impassioned thought leader. He’s also a valuable member of Finch’s advisory board, who has been instrumental in helping us identify our priorities.
We recently caught up with Craig to talk about the state of HCM, including a requisite pandemic analysis and the industry change he’d most like to see.
It was like an asteroid hit and pushed everything in another direction. I think the big focus before the pandemic was, how do I find the best people? What incentives and wellness programs can I offer? Then the world changed. People became entrepreneurs. They realized they can work from home and start their own businesses. I think that people also lost their attachment to their employer. They really started to ask, is this the right company for me?
What's happening now is that the HCM tech base has changed. It's become much more about, how do I evolve to support and keep my people that are amazing? What can I do to make sure that they're productive and successful in the world we live in? And the last piece of that is about providing connectedness. How do we build relationships when we're not in the office together? It’s a huge shift, and the HCM ecosystem is getting bigger as a result.
There’s a need to make systems talk together. You don't want a situation where a user has to log in to seven different accounts to enter the same piece of information. So, I think data and data communication is the number one thing.
I think the HR people within the organization get it, and I think that the data people in the organization get it. At the same time, the C-level is worried about the top and bottom line. They haven’t seen the benefit yet. So, I think that the HR and the data information people need to have a bigger seat at the table to talk about the Great Resignation and how to get the tools and data they need to create positive experiences for employees. I think leadership needs to better understand that there is a trickle down effect that happens when you have an employee who is not satisfied with their overall experience within the organization.
It’s interesting, because single sign-on has been around for a while, and everybody appreciates the instant gratification of it. We need to arm HR teams with information that shows what that impact is to the organization. The more tools and resources we can give to them, the quicker change can happen.
What's happening today is you have big HCM companies—the ones that everybody knows—that took their technology from premise based to cloud based. And as their APIs continue to evolve, it allows more fields and more information to be transmitted, which creates new use cases and new opportunities for growth. So, I think it's a combination of education, like I mentioned earlier, but I also think API technology transformation needs to happen to a certain degree—to allow for new use cases that people are looking for.
If you think of an API as a pipe with a lot of different cords going through it, then what I mean by API maturity is that someone is making that pipe, but they're only putting 20 cords in it, when it could be 45. And if you want to go in and build out those additional cords, there are implications at various points in the pipe. That's the reason people are scared to make a lot of changes to their APIs, because it could have a significant impact on employee records. You have to be really careful. It could break an area you don't even know about. It takes a lot of testing, there's security layers on top of it, and there's a lot of things that could happen illegally, too. The result is that you have smaller companies that are more willing to take the chance to do something innovative. Then you have enterprise companies that have been around for 50 or 60 years, and they're susceptible to lawsuits, so they're a lot less willing to take the risk that comes with change.
I believe in the HCM ecosystem; that is my biggest passion. I truly believe that companies are going to go to one HCM company less and less. At one point, the stats showed that an enterprise company touches something like 80 different sources, a mid-market company touches 40, and a small business touches 13. I believe that is going to shift up, especially as you add in wellness apps. Small businesses will touch 20 to 30. Mid-market will go to 80. As that happens, you need the data to flow. Otherwise, you're going to have to hire more people—data pushers—in the HCM space. Something like 56% of HR's manual tasks can still be automated. I think that's where Finch comes in. How do I make everything work together seamlessly, safely, and securely?
I would love to see better reporting on the back end. I know there's Tableau and others, but every one of those companies has their own reporting. As you build the ecosystem, you've got to go to this one for a report, and you have to go to that one for a report. I really think that there ought to be one place where you can grab all that data and figure out the overall impact of benefits to your company—how it impacts your turnover and hiring.
As a sales leader, I spend 50% of my time hiring, onboarding and training, and the other 50% of my time retaining, which is all about motivation, inspiration, leadership, and coaching. These things impact me every day, and the HCM space touches all of that.
My career in HCM was about the employee experience and how it impacted people's everyday lives. I saw a correlation between that and my work now, which is about impacting the buyer's life. If I can create a great experience for a mom-and-pop shop, a mid-market shop, or even an enterprise shop to give a great customer experience, so that people aren’t always buying through Amazon, then I have succeeded.
To start building with Finch, enter your email address on our homepage here to get API keys today.
Since 2020, the pace of experiences going virtual has snowballed – corporate learning and development (L&D) is no exception. Coupled with pressing talent concerns, L&D leaders across industries and verticals are poised to invest in learning management systems (LMS) that meet their need to remotely onboard, train, reskill, and upskill while also solving for their pain points around administration, organization, and analytics. Learning management systems that prioritize exceptional experiences for LMS admins and learners stand to come out on top.
One element of creating a best-in-class LMS experience is payroll and HR integrations. By connecting to the software employers use to manage their workforce, learning management systems can unlock product functions and features that set new bars in the LMS category.
In this blog post, we’ll discuss the L&D pain points HR and payroll integrations alleviate and how you can leverage them to optimize your own LMS platform in ways that meet or exceed your customers’ expectations.
Before we do, let’s dig into the mindset of your customers with a brief overview of the corporate L&D landscape, which is taking on new importance in the wake of COVID-19 and the social and economic forces defining our current reality.
For one, companies are struggling—both to keep employees motivated and to close skill gaps internally without resorting to expensive (and often unfruitful) talent recruitment initiatives. They’re also responding to demands to improve the DEI fluency of their teams and foster an authentically inclusive workplace culture. Then, there’s the growth of remote work and the need for virtual onboarding and training solutions to replace in-person experiences.
At many companies, L&D has been expected to bear the brunt of these challenges and more, earning L&D a place among c-suite priorities. The numbers bear this out:
Unsurprisingly, L&D teams are feeling more pressure to deliver on performance as well as more demands on their time. A recent survey found that the number of different L&D initiatives being deployed in 2022 has increased across the board, stretching L&D professionals thin.
To cope with their growing pains, L&D teams are looking to technology. Perhaps more than ever, they expect LMS solutions to save them time, drive learner engagement, and offer analytics that help them deliver the results they’ve been tasked with achieving.
Specifically, L&D professionals are concerned about three key areas of LMS functionality and performance:
An important element of solving these pain points for your customers is HR and payroll system integrations.
When you integrate with your customers’ HR and payroll systems, your LMS has access to their full trove of employee census data like name, job title, department, location, and much more. In turn, you unlock numerous opportunities to make your product more effective and efficient in ways that meet and exceed your customers’ expectations.
Here are just some of the ways HR and payroll integrations help you build a best-in-class LMS experience for your customers:
Assuming you’re sold on the value of HR and payroll system integrations, you have a couple of options. You can either build and maintain the integrations in-house—a complicated, resource-draining undertaking—or you can outsource integrations to a specialist like Finch.
With Finch, you get all the benefits of integrations without sacrificing your internal bandwidth. Our single, universal API makes it possible to access comprehensive data sets from an ever-growing number of HR and payroll providers (142 at the time of publication) with minimal coding and zero maintenance responsibilities.
Compare that to building in-house, which can cost companies in the vicinity of $300,000, including upfront development and ongoing upkeep.
Aside from cost savings, Finch standardizes data from disparate sources, so it’s immediately and optimally usable without intervention from your team or your customers—allowing you to focus on what you do best without having to worry about which of the many, many HR systems or payroll providers your customers use (check out our whitepaper on the fragmented US payroll landscape here).
Perhaps the most tangible benefit of Finch, though, is its effect on onboarding. What once took 30 days worth of file uploads, hand-holding, and back-and-forth correspondence with your customers is reduced to a quick and easy 30 seconds and completed entirely within your LMS. The process is simple:
We do all the legwork. For you and your customers, there’s nothing more to it.
Then there’s the matter of upkeep. When you go with Finch, integration maintenance is entirely in our court. So, instead of spending an average of 27 minutes on the phone with an HR or payroll provider trying to connect to their infrastructure so you can troubleshoot any inevitable issues that arise, you shoot us a support ticket, and we take care of it, reducing your effort to something closer to 27 seconds.
In essence, Finch ensures you can take advantage of everything HR and payroll integrations offer without any of the internal hassles or capacity issues you’d run into by keeping the work in-house. Consequently, you’ll have more internal resources to dedicate to your core product, allowing you to get to market sooner and accelerate your roadmap.
To start building with Finch, enter your email address on our homepage here to get API keys today.
Employment system integrations—that is, integrations with HR information systems and payroll systems—typically fall under the purview of product teams, but that doesn’t mean that they are strictly a product concern. In fact, a well executed employment system integration strategy has the potential to affect a myriad of aspects of your organization for the better, including your growth trajectory, opportunities for expansion, and expenses.
In other words, the decision to integrate with employment systems is a business one. As you weigh your options, consider these eight KPIs that employment system integrations often impact:
Employment system integrations enlarge the field of customers you can work with by enabling instant compatibility with the employment systems they use, allowing you to close more deals with a wider range of organizations.
This is especially true if your strategy entails partnering with a broad-coverage employment system API like Finch that enables connectivity with many systems from a single integration. In turn, your sales team is empowered to pursue segments of the market that would otherwise be uneconomic due to lack of connectivity. With Finch’s 150+ integrations, you can service 88% of U.S. employers—and many international ones—in one fell swoop.
Learn how Green Spaces was able to address 90% of potential customers by expanding its integration coverage with Finch.
With Finch’s single, universal API, Green Places gained real-time connectivity to more than 90% of its customers’ HR platforms. Just as critically, Finch affords Green Places more time and bandwidth to allocate to other areas of product development.
Increasingly, the availability of employment system integrations is an important purchase criterion. Having integrations in place at the outset of your engagement meets a key expectation of potential customers, which can help fast-track them through the sales pipeline to a signed contract.
On the other hand, if you’re following a bottom-up sales model, you’ll appreciate that employment system integrations enable a seamless data sync process that supports self-serve onboarding and product-led growth. In other words, leads can start using your product without having to speak to a sales rep, bypassing an extended sales pipeline altogether.
See how Mosaic was able to accelerate their sales pipeline and go live with integrations 94% faster than doing it in-house by working with Finch.
Many applications realize a boost in ACV when they offer integrations as part of a premium tier of service or product access. Because employment system integrations can save your customers hours of work at onboarding and fuel deluxe features and product enhancements, you can leverage integrations to persuade customers to sign larger deals.
If your product offers a self-serve motion accompanied by a free trial, data syncing via employment system integrations indicates a lead’s high intent to pay for your product. By granting access to their employment data, they’ve signified that they trust your value proposition and want to see your product drive ROI for their business.
Learn how MainStreet saved $65M+ for small business clients using a self-serve flow powered by Finch.
Acquiring new customers is helpful, but keeping them around for the long-term is how you build a sustainable business. Data connectivity via employment system integrations supports retention in multiple ways:
If your product relies on a usage-based business model driven by seats or per-employee-per-month (PEPM) growth, access to customers’ employment data gives you a direct line of sight into the potential size of their contract. It also streamlines the process of expanding usage by giving your customers the ability to track new employees and automate user invites.
Additionally, if your product has multiple buyers across an organization—say, finance and HR—you can leverage your access to real-time organizational structure data to cross-sell your product into other teams.
If you build employment system integrations in-house, the initiative will likely be a drain on your development resources. Assuming that three engineers will work on an integration for three months (or more, if your needs go beyond basic census data), that puts the engineering costs of just your initial build-out in the ballpark of $200,000. Multiply that by the number of integrations you need to adequately cover your customer base plus maintenance costs, and you are looking at a steep, ongoing investment.
Outsourcing employment system integrations to a third-party API like Finch saves you money by eliminating the need for multiple build-outs and drastically reducing the number of hours your engineering team has to dedicate to the project. Our team does the heavy lifting, including maintenance, so your internal talent can focus on your product’s core technology and UX.
Find out how Trainual reduced development costs by 75% by using Finch.
During onboarding and implementation, customers often require hand-holding—and one of the biggest hurdles they cross is data syncing. That means that your support team needs to be trained in the specific data syncing processes, formats, and idiosyncrasies of each system you integrate with—a monumental and costly training initiative. Even then, it often requires three to four calls with a customer to confirm connectivity. These are costs that don’t scale and can balloon as your customer base expands. Employment system integrations reduce the data syncing process from days to seconds and remove the friction that necessitates hand-holding in the first place, allowing you to save support resources for initiatives that increase customer loyalty.
Learn how Lane Health reduced support costs and eliminated 8-12 hours a month of manual data entry for their customers with Finch.
Integrating with employment systems isn’t just a slick product enhancement; it’s a strategic business initiative that drives measurable impact across your organization. Much of the ROI, however, depends on prudent execution—namely, partnering with a universal employment system API like Finch that can optimize coverage, performance, and cost efficiencies.
In short, Finch does the hard work of integrating with HRIS and payroll systems for you, so you can optimize the return. Our dynamic, unified API offers read-and-write access and abstracts away inconsistencies across systems for exceptional usability no matter the source.
Talk to one of our experts today to learn how Finch’s employment integrations can drive business outcomes for you.
If you’re a B2B application selling to employers—an employee training platform or employee engagement platform, for instance—then you know that creating additional value for your customers is critical to building a stickier product and, ultimately, ensuring your success. One way to create this value is to offer your customers deeper insights into their employee lifecycle by tracking the metrics customers care most about.
In this post, we’ve collaborated with ChartHop to dive into three employee lifecycle KPIs you can derive from employment data housed in your customers’ HRIS and payroll systems. Read how they are transforming their customers’ employee lifecycles here.
By surfacing similar metrics for your customers, you can help them create a better employment experience.
Let’s get started!
As employees move up the ranks or across positions, the path they take can be tracked. Known as career mobility, this movement encompasses both the standard promotional structure (i.e., when employees earn greater responsibility and more senior titles) as well as lateral movement between teams and departments. So, why is this data important?
Tracking employee movement across positions and departments allows you to provide your customers with a detailed summary of their organization’s propensity to create growth and development opportunities for their employees. They can then use this data to give new hires a better understanding of the long-term career paths available to them from their first-day onwards—which can aid in cultivating a workplace culture that’s conducive to employee retention.
This metric also allows you to provide your customers with more granular insights into the flow of employees between departments. By divvying up the data by team, you can weigh how certain sectors of the organization are performing in regard to developing growth opportunities against others and reveal areas in need of improvement.
Calculating internal mobility is simple: take the total number of internal movements and divide it by the average number of employees during the same time period. Once you have this number, multiply it by 100 to turn it into a percentage.
Because many systems don’t show historical organizational structure changes, you will need to record this data over time across the organization before you can calculate internal mobility rate. Here’s how:
Learn how to ensure equitable promotions for your customers’ employees.
Any income an employee earns in the course of their regular employment is considered part of their compensation history. This can include their salary, bonuses they’ve received, commissions they’ve earned, and tips.
Knowing this information is important because it gives you a deeper understanding of your customers’ compensation distribution. This helps you flag potential areas of inequity or inconsistency across different teams, demographics, and positions, allowing your customers to improve employee retention in the long run and offer competitive compensation packages that draw top-quality talent.
To calculate compensation history, simply add an employee’s salary, bonuses, commissions, tips/wages, and any other sources of income together for the time period you want to track.
To gain the most visibility into employee earnings, you’ll want to leverage both Payment and Pay Statement endpoints as well as the Employment endpoint, which contains data like base income and pay frequency.
Alternatively, many providers can also provide access to historical compensation changes which Finch surfaces in the Employment endpoint under the income history array. This array will include the unit, amount, currency, and effective date of previous income changes.
Read more about how companies can build responsible compensation plans.
Employee turnover rate is the percentage of employees that leave an organization within a given period. You can use this data to drill down into more specific subsets of your customers’ organizations like individual departments or demographic groups.
If your product is centered around increasing engagement or employee retention, this data is crucial, as it allows you to spot potential issues that can save your customers money and improve employee morale and retention over the long term.
To calculate an organization’s turnover rate, you’ll want to divide the employees that left over a particular span of time by the average number of employees for that same period.
Pulling the data you need to calculate turnover rate from Finch is a simple process:
Find out what turnover rate can tell you about your customers’ business.
By leveraging the above insights, you’ll be able to better add value to your customers’ organizations—helping them streamline employee development, increase employee engagement, and boost team cohesion. This creates a better work experience that makes them more likely to retain their workers—and retain your platform’s services.
Discover how Finch helps you harness the power of employment data to provide your customers with key insights in real time. Click here to sign up for free.
Want to get in touch with our friends at Charthop to unlock people insights for your organization? Click here to learn more about what you can do when all your people data is in one place.